BACKGROUND: Smoking restrictions provide opportunities to modify smoking behavior. A large insurance company implemented a smoke-free grounds policy at two of their office complexes in January, 2000. METHODS: This cohort study evaluated the impact of the smoke-free grounds policy on abstinence among 128 employees who participated in a tobacco dependence treatment program. RESULTS: The overall quit rate at 6 months was 44.5%. The larger complex showed a trend for higher quit rates compared to the smaller complex (46.5 vs. 28.6%). Post-ban participants had higher quit rates than pre-ban participants (52.4 vs. 43.0%). The probability of abstinence at 6 months follow-up was higher for post-ban compared to pre-ban participants (P = 0.03). Post-ban participants were 80% less likely to relapse than pre-ban participants. Non-quitters decreased their consumption by 6.6 cigarettes/day (39.1% decrease). CONCLUSIONS: A "smoke-free grounds" policy encourages abstinence and may play a significant role in harm reduction among continuing tobacco users.
BACKGROUND: Smoking restrictions provide opportunities to modify smoking behavior. A large insurance company implemented a smoke-free grounds policy at two of their office complexes in January, 2000. METHODS: This cohort study evaluated the impact of the smoke-free grounds policy on abstinence among 128 employees who participated in a tobacco dependence treatment program. RESULTS: The overall quit rate at 6 months was 44.5%. The larger complex showed a trend for higher quit rates compared to the smaller complex (46.5 vs. 28.6%). Post-ban participants had higher quit rates than pre-ban participants (52.4 vs. 43.0%). The probability of abstinence at 6 months follow-up was higher for post-ban compared to pre-ban participants (P = 0.03). Post-ban participants were 80% less likely to relapse than pre-ban participants. Non-quitters decreased their consumption by 6.6 cigarettes/day (39.1% decrease). CONCLUSIONS: A "smoke-free grounds" policy encourages abstinence and may play a significant role in harm reduction among continuing tobacco users.
Authors: Dariush Mozaffarian; Ashkan Afshin; Neal L Benowitz; Vera Bittner; Stephen R Daniels; Harold A Franch; David R Jacobs; William E Kraus; Penny M Kris-Etherton; Debra A Krummel; Barry M Popkin; Laurie P Whitsel; Neil A Zakai Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-08-20 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Clare Meernik; Hannah M Baker; Karina Paci; Isaiah Fischer-Brown; Daniel Dunlap; Adam O Goldstein Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-12-29 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Adam O Goldstein; Julea Steiner; Anna McCullough; Kathryn D Kramer; Melva Fager Okun Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2009-11-10 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Sarah E Seidel; Kristi Metzger; Andrea Guerra; Jessie Patton-Levine; Sandeepkumar Singh; William T Wilson; Philip Huang Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2017-12-14 Impact factor: 2.830