Literature DB >> 15273739

Comparison of gene-expression profiles between diffuse- and intestinal-type gastric cancers using a genome-wide cDNA microarray.

Natini Jinawath1, Yoichi Furukawa, Suguru Hasegawa, Meihua Li, Tatsuhiko Tsunoda, Seiji Satoh, Toshiharu Yamaguchi, Hiroshi Imamura, Masatomo Inoue, Hitoshi Shiozaki, Yusuke Nakamura.   

Abstract

Gastric cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the world. Two histologically distinct types of gastric carcinoma, 'intestinal' and 'diffuse', have different epidemiological and pathophysiological features that suggest different mechanisms of carcinogenesis. A number of studies have investigated intestinal-type gastric cancers at the molecular level, but little is known about mechanisms involved in the diffuse type, which has a more invasive phenotype and poorer prognosis. To clarify the mechanisms that underlie its development and/or progression, we compared the expression profiles of 20 laser-microbeam-microdissected diffuse-type gastric-cancer tissues with corresponding noncancerous mucosae by means of a cDNA microarray containing 23,040 genes. We identified 153 genes that were commonly upregulated and more than 1500 that were commonly downregulated in the tumors. We also identified a number of genes related to tumor progression. Furthermore, comparison of the expression profiles of diffuse-type with those of intestinal-type gastric cancers identified 46 genes that may represent distinct molecular signatures of each histological type. The putative signature of diffuse-type cancer exhibited altered expression of genes related to cell-matrix interaction and extracellular-matrix (ECM) components, whereas that of intestinal-type cancer represented enhancement of cell growth. These data provide insight into different mechanisms underlying gastric carcinogenesis and may also serve as a starting point for identifying novel diagnostic markers and/or therapeutic targets for diffuse-type gastric cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15273739     DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207886

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncogene        ISSN: 0950-9232            Impact factor:   9.867


  53 in total

1.  Solution structure of the human HSPC280 protein.

Authors:  Jinzhong Lin; Tao Zhou; Jinfeng Wang
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  MicroRNA-34a inhibits tumor invasion and metastasis in gastric cancer by targeting Tgif2.

Authors:  Yang Hu; Qingha Pu; Bin Cui; Jia Lin
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-08-01

3.  Gene expression profiling of gastric cancer by microarray combined with laser capture microdissection.

Authors:  Ming-Shiang Wu; Yi-Shing Lin; Yu-Ting Chang; Chia-Tung Shun; Ming-Tsan Lin; Jaw-Town Lin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Integrated analysis identified an intestinal-like and a diffuse-like gene sets that predict gastric cancer outcome.

Authors:  Cheng Zhang; Li Min; Jiafei Liu; Wei Tian; Yong Han; Like Qu; Chengchao Shou
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-11-17

Review 5.  Global analysis of gene expression in gastric ischemia-reperfusion: a future therapeutic direction for mucosal protective drugs.

Authors:  Yuji Naito; Katsura Mizushima; Toshikazu Yoshikawa
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Deregulation of the cell polarity protein Lethal giant larvae 2 (Lgl2) correlates with gastric cancer progression.

Authors:  Kyung Han Nam; Min A Kim; Gheeyoung Choe; Woo Ho Kim; Hye Seung Lee
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 7.  Advances of Molecular Targeted Therapy in Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Bulent Cetin; Ozge Gumusay; Mustafa Cengiz; Ahmet Ozet
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2016-06

8.  Stomach carcinoma incidence patterns in the United States by histologic type and anatomic site.

Authors:  Hongyu Wu; Jennifer A Rusiecki; Kangmin Zhu; John Potter; Susan S Devesa
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  KEGG spider: interpretation of genomics data in the context of the global gene metabolic network.

Authors:  Alexey V Antonov; Sabine Dietmann; Hans W Mewes
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  Mouse gastric tumor models with prostaglandin E2 pathway activation show similar gene expression profiles to intestinal-type human gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hiraku Itadani; Hiroko Oshima; Masanobu Oshima; Hidehito Kotani
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.