Literature DB >> 15273714

High-dose CEB vs BEAM with autologous stem cell transplant in lymphoma.

E H Wang1, Y A Chen, S Corringham, A Bashey, P Holman, E D Ball, E Carrier.   

Abstract

Between January 1996 and July 2002, 72 patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or Hodgkin's disease underwent high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplant conditioned with either cyclophosphamide, etoposide, carmustine (CEB) or carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan (BEAM) at a single institution. In all, 52 patients received CEB and 20 patients received the BEAM regimen. Patient characteristics that were significantly different between the two groups are tumor grade and extranodal involvement (P = 0.0196, 0.0341, respectively). Regimen-related toxicities examined yielded only diarrhea occurring at a higher rate in the BEAM group (81 vs 51%, P = 0.0026), although cases were milder (92 vs 57%). Patients treated with CEB developed mucositis at a slightly higher rate (79%) than patients treated with BEAM (75%), but this difference did not reach statistical significance. However, the mucositis that occurred within the BEAM group was predominately mild (67%) in contrast to the predominance of moderate to severe cases in the CEB group (74%). In addition, patients treated with CEB required growth factor support for a longer time than patients treated with BEAM (P = 0.0399). Response rates were high in both groups, with trends favoring the BEAM group. Overall survival was higher after treatment with BEAM than with CEB (84 vs 60%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15273714     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1704637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 0268-3369            Impact factor:   5.483


  10 in total

1.  LACE versus BEAM conditioning in relapsed and refractory lymphoma transplant: retrospective multicenter analysis of toxicity and efficacy.

Authors:  Navin Khattry; Alok Gupta; Reetu Jain; Adwaita Gore; Ravi Thippeswamy; Nandish Jeevangi; Sadhana Kannan; Reena Nair; Tapan Saikia
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 2.490

2.  A retrospective comparison of toxicity and initial efficacy of two autologous stem cell transplant conditioning regimens for relapsed lymphoma: LEAM and BEAM.

Authors:  J Kothari; M Foley; K S Peggs; S Mackenzie; K Thomson; E Morris; K M Ardeshna; A E Virchis; D C Linch; J Lambert
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 5.483

3.  Evaluation of Lymphoma Patients Receiving High-Dose Therapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation: Experience of a Single Center.

Authors:  Yakup Bozkaya; Doğan Uncu; Simten Dağdaş; Gökmen Umut Erdem; Mutlu Doğan; Gülsüm Özet; Nurullah Zengin
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 0.900

4.  Efficacy of Pharmacokinetics-Directed Busulfan, Cyclophosphamide, and Etoposide Conditioning and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Lymphoma: Comparison of a Multicenter Phase II Study and CIBMTR Outcomes.

Authors:  Christopher R Flowers; Luciano J Costa; Marcelo C Pasquini; Jennifer Le-Rademacher; Michael Lill; Tsiporah B Shore; William Vaughan; Michael Craig; Cesar O Freytes; Thomas C Shea; Mitchell E Horwitz; Joseph W Fay; Shin Mineishi; Damiano Rondelli; James Mason; Ira Braunschweig; Weiyun Ai; Rosa F Yeh; Tulio E Rodriguez; Ian Flinn; Terrance Comeau; Andrew M Yeager; Michael A Pulsipher; Isabelle Bence-Bruckler; Pierre Laneuville; Philip Bierman; Andy I Chen; Kazunobu Kato; Yanlin Wang; Cong Xu; Angela J Smith; Edmund K Waller
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Safety and feasibility of high-dose ranimustine (MCNU), carboplatin, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide (MCVC) therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation for malignant lymphoma.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Kameoka; Naoto Takahashi; Kenichi Ishizawa; Yuichi Kato; Jugo Ito; Osamu Sasaki; Kazunori Murai; Hideyoshi Noji; Makoto Hirokawa; Katsusi Tajima; Tsutomu Shichishima; Yoji Ishida; Hideo Harigae; Kenichi Sawada
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 2.319

6.  Comparison of BEAM vs. LEAM regimen in autologous transplant for lymphoma at AIIMS.

Authors:  Atul Sharma; Smita Kayal; Sobuhi Iqbal; Prabhat Singh Malik; Vinod Raina
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-09-26

7.  Treatment of oral mucositis in hematologic patients undergoing autologous or allogeneic transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells: a prospective, randomized study with a mouthwash containing camelia sinensis leaf extract.

Authors:  Giovanni Carulli; Melania Rocco; Alessia Panichi; Chiara Feira Chios; Ester Ciurli; Chiara Mannucci; Elisabetta Sordi; Francesco Caracciolo; Federico Papineschi; Edoardo Benedetti; Mario Petrini
Journal:  Hematol Rep       Date:  2013-04-04

8.  Finding the Optimal Conditioning Regimen for Relapsed/Refractory Lymphoma Patients Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Retrospective Comparison of BEAM and High-Dose ICE.

Authors:  Onur Esbah; Emre Tekgündüz; Itır Şirinoğlu Demiriz; Sinem Civriz Bozdağ; Ali Kaya; Ayşegül Tetik; Ömür Kayıkçı; Gamze Durgun; Şerife Kocubaba; Fevzi Altuntaş
Journal:  Turk J Haematol       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 1.831

9.  Long-Term Outcomes and Safety Trends of Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Report From A Tertiary Care Center in India.

Authors:  Sudhir Kumar; Atul Sharma; Raja Pramanik; Neha Pathak; Ajay Gogia; Akash Kumar; Smita Kayal; Vinod Sharma; Ranjit Kumar Sahoo; Sanjay Thulkar; M C Sharma; Ritu Gupta; Soumya Mallick; Mercy Thomas; Vinod Raina
Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol       Date:  2022-05

10.  Association and risk factors of healthcare-associated infection and burden of illness among chemotherapy-induced ulcerative mucositis patients.

Authors:  P S Satheeshkumar; M P Mohan
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 3.606

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.