Literature DB >> 15272918

Systematic dose-extension of octreotide LAR: the importance of individual tailoring of treatment in patients with acromegaly.

Helen E Turner1, Viv A Thornton-Jones, John A H Wass.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The depot long-acting somatostatin analogue octreotide LAR (LAR) provides effective and well-tolerated treatment for acromegaly. Despite a 4-weekly recommended injection frequency, prolonged duration of GH suppression has been observed in some patients following treatment with long-acting somatostatin analogues. The aim of our study was to perform a prospective systematic study to determine whether extending the interval between doses of LAR allows maintenance of 'safe' GH in selected patients with acromegaly. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients (15 men, seven women), mean age 58.9 years (35-81 years) with active acromegaly (mGH > 5 mU/l), requiring treatment were selected to receive treatment with LAR. Eleven patients had received previous treatment with both transsphenoidal surgery and radiotherapy, while six had received surgery alone. All patients were commenced on treatment with 20 mg LAR intramuscularly (i.m.) every 4 weeks. Mean GH (mGH) was measured after three consecutive injections immediately prior to the fourth injection. The dose frequency was systematically reduced after every four injections if mGH < 5 mU/l. Once mGH > 5 mU/l, the dose frequency was increased and mGH reassessed.
RESULTS: The dosing interval was successfully increased to greater than 4 weeks in 20/22 patients (90.9%). Six of 22 (27.3%) were receiving injections every 8 weeks and 3/22 (13.6%) every 12 weeks. GH and IGF-I were lower on treatment compared with baseline (P < 0.01). There was no difference in individual mGH and IGF-I between the values on 4-weekly dosing and those at final dose frequency. There was no relationship between final dose frequency and either mean GH or IGF-I prior to LAR, patient age, or previous treatment. The percentage suppression following 100 micro g octreotide subcutaneously did not predict subsequent dose frequency of LAR. The drug cost if patients had continued at 4-weekly intervals would be UK pound 187 850, compared with UK pound 101 065 for the individually titrated dose frequency (P < 0.01). This represents a final cost of 53.8% of the 4-weekly injection price.
CONCLUSION: Individual tailoring of LAR administration maintains control of acromegaly, with reduced injection frequency and improved cost-effectiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15272918     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2004.02084.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)        ISSN: 0300-0664            Impact factor:   3.478


  12 in total

1.  Somatostatin analog withdrawal in patients with acromegaly: an elusive goal?

Authors:  Moisés Mercado
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  Ectopic growth hormone-releasing hormone secretion by a metastatic bronchial carcinoid tumor: a case with a non hypophysial intracranial tumor that shrank during long acting octreotide treatment.

Authors:  Patricia Fainstein Day; Lawrence Frohman; Hernan Garcia Rivello; Jean Claude Reubi; Gustavo Sevlever; Mariela Glerean; Tomas Fernandez Gianotti; Marcelo Pietrani; Alejandra Rabadan; Silvina Racioppi; Martin Bidlingmaier
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.107

3.  Octreotide LAR treatment of acromegaly in "real life": long-term outcome at a tertiary care center.

Authors:  Ana Laura Espinosa-de-los-Monteros; Baldomero Gonzalez; Guadalupe Vargas; Ernesto Sosa; Moises Mercado
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 4.  Treatment of pituitary tumors: somatostatin.

Authors:  Maria A Tichomirowa; Adrian F Daly; Albert Beckers
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 5.  Octreotide and Lanreotide in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Venkata K Pokuri; Mei Ka Fong; Renuka Iyer
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 6.  From somatostatin to octreotide LAR: evolution of a somatostatin analogue.

Authors:  Lowell Anthony; Pamela U Freda
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.580

Review 7.  Medical therapy of acromegaly: efficacy and safety of somatostatin analogues.

Authors:  Richard A Feelders; Leo J Hofland; Maarten O van Aken; Sebastian J Neggers; Steven W J Lamberts; Wouter W de Herder; Aart-Jan van der Lely
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Evaluation of long-acting somatostatin analog injection devices by nurses: a quantitative study.

Authors:  Daphne T Adelman; Andrea Burgess; Philippa R Davies
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2012-12-14

Review 9.  Management of acromegaly in Latin America: expert panel recommendations.

Authors:  Ariel Barkan; Marcello D Bronstein; Oscar D Bruno; Alejandro Cob; Ana Laura Espinosa-de-los-Monteros; Monica R Gadelha; Gloria Garavito; Mirtha Guitelman; Ruth Mangupli; Moisés Mercado; Lesly Portocarrero; Michael Sheppard
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 10.  The endocrine tumor summit 2008: appraising therapeutic approaches for acromegaly and carcinoid syndrome.

Authors:  Anne Klibanski; Shlomo Melmed; David R Clemmons; Annamaria Colao; Regina S Cunningham; Mark E Molitch; Aaron I Vinik; Daphne T Adelman; Karen J P Liebert
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.107

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.