Literature DB >> 15272530

The use of cell line standards to reduce HER-2/neu assay variation in multiple European cancer centers and the potential of automated image analysis to provide for more accurate cut points for predicting clinical response to trastuzumab.

Anthony Rhodes1, Duncan Borthwick, Rob Sykes, Salam Al-Sam, Angelo Paradiso.   

Abstract

Immunohistochemical analysis, the most efficient way of assaying for HER-2/neu overexpression in patients with invasive breast cancer, is subject to variation in sensitivity and evaluation when used in multiple laboratories. Cell lines with differing but constant levels of HER-2/neu expression have been advocated as standard material against which assay sensitivity can be gauged. Automated image analysis could provide more precise linear measurements of HER-2/neu expression than the subjective and categorical scoring system originally designed for the HER-2/neu clinical trials. Multiple European laboratories (range, 92-126) stained 7 cell line standards on 6 successive occasions using a variety of immunohistochemical assays for HER-2/neu. During the 2-year study period, a trend toward a standard sensitivity level was observed, with significant improvement in numbers of laboratories achieving appropriate results. Image analysis gave reproducible and significantly different linear values for a total of 621 HER-2/neu results on cell lines previously categorized manually as 3+, 2+, 1+, or 0. The use of cell line standards and image analysis have the potential to assist in standardizing immunohistochemical results for predictive markers and provide more accurate and quantifiable cut points for predicting clinical response to therapy, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15272530     DOI: 10.1309/61AN-J1XV-3MW8-78YP

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  13 in total

1.  Multiple biomarker expression on circulating tumor cells in comparison to tumor tissues from primary and metastatic sites in patients with locally advanced/inflammatory, and stage IV breast cancer, using a novel detection technology.

Authors:  George Somlo; Sean K Lau; Paul Frankel; H Ben Hsieh; Xiaohe Liu; Lixin Yang; Robert Krivacic; Richard H Bruce
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  External Quality Assurance in Immunohistochemistry - Is It the Solution to a Complex Problem?

Authors:  Angelika Reiner-Concin
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Melanoma inhibitor of apoptosis protein is expressed differentially in melanoma and melanocytic naevus, but similarly in primary and metastatic melanomas.

Authors:  J Gong; N Chen; Q Zhou; B Yang; Y Wang; X Wang
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Comparison of liquid based cytology and histology for the evaluation of HER-2 status using immunostaining and CISH in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  H Sartelet; E Lagonotte; M Lorenzato; I Duval; C Lechki; C Rigaud; J Cucherousset; A Durlach; O Graesslin; P Abboud; M Doco-Fenzy; C Quereux; B Costa; M Polette; J-N Munck; P Birembaut
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Molecular preservation by extraction and fixation, mPREF: a method for small molecule biomarker analysis and histology on exactly the same tissue.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Shuster; Raymond S Lance; Dean A Troyer
Journal:  BMC Clin Pathol       Date:  2011-12-21

6.  Optical fiber-based in vivo quantification of growth factor receptors.

Authors:  Thommey P Thomas; Yu-Chung Chang; Jing Yong Ye; Alina Kotlyar; Zhengyi Cao; Rameshwer Shukla; Suyang Qin; Theodore B Norris; James R Baker
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Immunohistochemical detection of estrogen and progesterone receptor and HER2 expression in breast carcinomas: comparison of cell block and tissue block preparations.

Authors:  Sharenda L Williams; George G Birdsong; Cynthia Cohen; Momin T Siddiqui
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2009-01-20

8.  Image analysis as an adjunct to manual HER-2 immunohistochemical review: a diagnostic tool to standardize interpretation.

Authors:  Lynne Dobson; Catherine Conway; Alan Hanley; Alex Johnson; Sean Costello; Anthony O'Grady; Yvonne Connolly; Hilary Magee; Daniel O'Shea; Michael Jeffers; Elaine Kay
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 5.087

9.  Comparison of automated silver enhanced in situ hybridisation (SISH) and fluorescence ISH (FISH) for the validation of HER2 gene status in breast carcinoma according to the guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists.

Authors:  M Dietel; I O Ellis; H Höfler; H Kreipe; H Moch; A Dankof; K Kölble; G Kristiansen
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 4.064

10.  Inter-observer reproducibility of HER2 immunohistochemical assessment and concordance with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH): pathologist assessment compared to quantitative image analysis.

Authors:  Gulisa Turashvili; Samuel Leung; Dmitry Turbin; Kelli Montgomery; Blake Gilks; Rob West; Melinda Carrier; David Huntsman; Samuel Aparicio
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.