BACKGROUND: Intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis is observed in several inflammatory disorders of the central nervous system, but its detection by current laboratory tests is either tedious or relatively insensitive. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of an assay for kappa free light chains (kappaFLC) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum, and compared it with traditional tests for intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis. METHODS: kappaFLCs were measured by nephelometry in CSF/serum pairs from 112 patients. Samples were excluded if blood contamination of CSF as a result of traumatic lumbar puncture (n = 12) or monoclonal bands in both CSF and serum (n = 5) were present. The remaining sample pairs were grouped according to the presence (n = 71) or absence (n = 24) of oligoclonal bands. Data were analyzed as kappaFLC concentrations in CSF, as kappaFLC CSF/serum ratios, and by use of the quotient diagram described previously for immunoglobulins. RESULTS: Both kappaFLC concentrations in CSF and the kappaFLC CSF/serum ratio identified patients with oligoclonal bands with high specificity and sensitivity. The areas under the ROC curves were 0.991 (95% confidence interval, 0.944-0.998) and 0.978 (0.924-0.996), respectively. Exclusion of patients with impaired blood-CSF barrier function further improved diagnostic accuracy. To account for patients with impaired blood-CSF barrier function, data were also analyzed in a quotient diagram. Only two patients without detectable oligoclonal bands would have been misclassified by this approach. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that the nephelometric assay for kappaFLCs in CSF reliably detects intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis. This automated and quantitative method could simplify the diagnostic procedure for CSF analysis in the routine laboratory.
BACKGROUND: Intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis is observed in several inflammatory disorders of the central nervous system, but its detection by current laboratory tests is either tedious or relatively insensitive. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of an assay for kappa free light chains (kappaFLC) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum, and compared it with traditional tests for intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis. METHODS: kappaFLCs were measured by nephelometry in CSF/serum pairs from 112 patients. Samples were excluded if blood contamination of CSF as a result of traumatic lumbar puncture (n = 12) or monoclonal bands in both CSF and serum (n = 5) were present. The remaining sample pairs were grouped according to the presence (n = 71) or absence (n = 24) of oligoclonal bands. Data were analyzed as kappaFLC concentrations in CSF, as kappaFLC CSF/serum ratios, and by use of the quotient diagram described previously for immunoglobulins. RESULTS: Both kappaFLC concentrations in CSF and the kappaFLC CSF/serum ratio identified patients with oligoclonal bands with high specificity and sensitivity. The areas under the ROC curves were 0.991 (95% confidence interval, 0.944-0.998) and 0.978 (0.924-0.996), respectively. Exclusion of patients with impaired blood-CSF barrier function further improved diagnostic accuracy. To account for patients with impaired blood-CSF barrier function, data were also analyzed in a quotient diagram. Only two patients without detectable oligoclonal bands would have been misclassified by this approach. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that the nephelometric assay for kappaFLCs in CSF reliably detects intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis. This automated and quantitative method could simplify the diagnostic procedure for CSF analysis in the routine laboratory.
Authors: Sophie Desplat-Jégo; Lionel Feuillet; Jean Pelletier; Dominique Bernard; André Ali Chérif; José Boucraut Journal: J Clin Immunol Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 8.317
Authors: Stefan Presslauer; Dejan Milosavljevic; Thomas Brücke; Peter Bayer; Wolfgang Hübl; Walter Hübl Journal: J Neurol Date: 2008-07-17 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: B Kaplan; S Golderman; E Ganelin-Cohen; A Miniovitch; E Korf; I Ben-Zvi; A Livneh; S Flechter Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2017-12-26 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: David Zeman; Pavlína Kušnierová; Zdeněk Švagera; František Všianský; Monika Byrtusová; Pavel Hradílek; Barbora Kurková; Olga Zapletalová; Vladimír Bartoš Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: P Menéndez-Valladares; M I García-Sánchez; P Cuadri Benítez; M Lucas; M Adorna Martínez; V Carranco Galán; J L García De Veas Silva; C Bermudo Guitarte; G Izquierdo Ayuso Journal: Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin Date: 2015-12-16
Authors: Philipp Schwenkenbecher; Franz Felix Konen; Ulrich Wurster; Konstantin Fritz Jendretzky; Stefan Gingele; Kurt-Wolfram Sühs; Refik Pul; Torsten Witte; Martin Stangel; Thomas Skripuletz Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2018-11-29 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Makbule Senel; Fatemeh Mojib-Yezdani; Ulrike Braisch; Franziska Bachhuber; Jan Lewerenz; Albert C Ludolph; Markus Otto; Hayrettin Tumani Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2019-03-29 Impact factor: 7.561