Literature DB >> 15271241

Diagnosis and management of pineocytomas.

Vivek R Deshmukh1, Kris A Smith, Harold L Rekate, Stephen Coons, Robert F Spetzler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Pineocytomas are associated with the most favorable prognosis of all pineal tumors. However, a subset of pineocytomas may have a predilection for recurrence and therefore behave aggressively. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Records of nine patients (five men, four women; mean age, 44 yr; range, 24-63 yr) with histologically diagnosed pineocytomas consecutively treated between 1990 and 2003 were reviewed retrospectively to identify factors predictive of aggressiveness. Eight patients presented with hydrocephalus and four with tectal compression. Three patients underwent gross total resection, and six underwent subtotal resection or biopsy.
RESULTS: Three local recurrences necessitated reoperation. One recurrence involved the obex of the fourth ventricle. The mean time to recurrence was 3.5 years (range, 1-7 yr). There was no correlation between histological features and tumor recurrence. Patients undergoing radiosurgery showed stable or attenuated local disease (mean follow-up, 19.3 mo; range, 6-36 mo). Mean radiographic follow-up was 34 months (range, 6 mo to 10 yr). Mean clinical follow-up was 36 months (range, 1 mo to 10 yr).
CONCLUSION: A subset of pineocytomas demonstrates the potential for symptomatic recurrence. We advocate an attempt at gross total tumor resection for all symptomatic patients with tectal plate compression, reserving radiosurgery for small, subtotally resected, or recurrent lesions. Patients must be followed closely for recurrence. Radiosurgery seems to be beneficial for local tumor control. Further investigation is needed to identify histological markers for pineocytomas that behave aggressively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15271241     DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000129479.70696.d2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  5 in total

1.  Pineal parenchymal tumors. Management with interstitial iodine-125 radiosurgery.

Authors:  Mohammad Maarouf; Faycal El Majdoub; Christian Bührle; Jürgen Voges; Ralph Lehrke; Martin Kocher; Stefan Hunsche; Harald Treuer; Volker Sturm
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 2.  Microsurgical resection of pineal region tumors.

Authors:  Adam M Sonabend; Stephen Bowden; Jeffrey N Bruce
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Factors influencing overall survival rates for patients with pineocytoma.

Authors:  Aaron J Clark; Michael E Sughrue; Michael E Ivan; Derick Aranda; Martin J Rutkowski; Ari J Kane; Susan Chang; Andrew T Parsa
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Histopathologic review of pineal parenchymal tumors identifies novel morphologic subtypes and prognostic factors for outcome.

Authors:  David R Raleigh; David A Solomon; Shane A Lloyd; Ann Lazar; Michael A Garcia; Penny K Sneed; Jennifer L Clarke; Michael W McDermott; Mitchel S Berger; Tarik Tihan; Daphne A Haas-Kogan
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 12.300

5.  Pineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation: diagnostic pitfalls and discussion of treatment options of a rare tumor entity.

Authors:  Christian Senft; Andreas Raabe; Elke Hattingen; Daniel Sommerlad; Volker Seifert; Kea Franz
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 3.042

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.