Literature DB >> 15271003

Perception of three-dimensional shape from specular highlights, deformations of shading, and other types of visual information.

J Farley Norman1, James T Todd, Guy A Orban.   

Abstract

There have been numerous computational models developed in an effort to explain how the human visual system analyzes three-dimensional (3D) surface shape from patterns of image shading, but they all share some important limitations. Models that are applicable to individual static images cannot correctly interpret regions that contain specular highlights, and those that are applicable to moving images have difficulties when a surface moves relative to its sources of illumination. Here we describe a psychophysical experiment that measured the sensitivity of human observers to small differences of 3D shape over a wide variety of conditions. The results provide clear evidence that the presence of specular highlights or the motions of a surface relative to its light source do not pose an impediment to perception, but rather, provide powerful sources of information for the perceptual analysis of 3D shape.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15271003     DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00720.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  21 in total

1.  Conjoint measurement of gloss and surface texture.

Authors:  Yun-Xian Ho; Michael S Landy; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-02

2.  Enhanced visualisation for minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Johannes Totz; Kenko Fujii; Peter Mountney; Guang-Zhong Yang
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-06-19       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Specular reflections and the estimation of shape from binocular disparity.

Authors:  Alexander A Muryy; Andrew E Welchman; Andrew Blake; Roland W Fleming
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Shape from shading in starlings (Sturnus vulgaris).

Authors:  Muhammad A J Qadri; L Michael Romero; Robert G Cook
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 2.231

5.  Countershading enhances camouflage by reducing prey contrast.

Authors:  Callum G Donohue; Jan M Hemmi; Jennifer L Kelley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  3D Shape Perception in Posterior Cortical Atrophy: A Visual Neuroscience Perspective.

Authors:  Céline R Gillebert; Jolien Schaeverbeke; Christine Bastin; Veerle Neyens; Rose Bruffaerts; An-Sofie De Weer; Alexandra Seghers; Stefan Sunaert; Koen Van Laere; Jan Versijpt; Mathieu Vandenbulcke; Eric Salmon; James T Todd; Guy A Orban; Rik Vandenberghe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Stereoscopic Offset Makes Objects Easier to Recognize.

Authors:  Baptiste Caziot; Benjamin T Backus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Is the perception of 3D shape from shading based on assumed reflectance and illumination?

Authors:  James T Todd; Eric J L Egan; Flip Phillips
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2014-09-18

9.  The extraction of 3D shape from texture and shading in the human brain.

Authors:  Svetlana S Georgieva; James T Todd; Ronald Peeters; Guy A Orban
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  fMRI evidence for areas that process surface gloss in the human visual cortex.

Authors:  Hua-Chun Sun; Hiroshi Ban; Massimiliano Di Luca; Andrew E Welchman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.