Literature DB >> 15269154

Interlaboratory comparison of HER-2 oncogene amplification as detected by chromogenic and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Jorma Isola1, Minna Tanner, Amanda Forsyth, Timothy G Cooke, Amanda D Watters, John M S Bartlett.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) is a new modification of the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technique for detection of oncogene amplification in archival tumor samples. In CISH, the oncogene probe is detected using a peroxidase reaction, allowing use of transmitted light microscopy. We compared detection of HER-2/neu amplification by CISH with a Food and Drug Administration-approved two-color FISH test in an interlaboratory setting. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples from 197 breast cancers were analyzed for HER-2 amplification by CISH. Two-color FISH (PathVysion) CISH of 17 centromere was done if the observer considered it necessary to ascertain amplification status in tumors with borderline HER-2 CISH copy numbers.
RESULTS: Paired CISH/FISH results were available from 192 (97%) of 197 cases, no clear difference in success rates of either method was observed. Centromere 17 CISH was considered necessary in seven tumors. CISH and two-color FISH results were concordant in 180 cases (93.8%). There were 92 and 88 tumors found HER-2 amplified and nonamplified, respectively, by both methods. Eight tumors were amplified by CISH but not by FISH, and four tumors exhibited the opposite condition (kappa coefficient 0.875). In 7 of 12 cases differences between the two methods could have related to a lack of CISH chromosome 17 information. The remaining cases were explained by difficult histology (ductal carcinoma in situ, poor representativity, dense lymphocytic infiltration, or intratumoral heterogeneity).
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that CISH could provide an accurate and practical alternative to FISH for clinical diagnosis of HER-2/neu oncogene amplification in archival formalin-fixed breast cancer samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15269154     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-0428-03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  32 in total

1.  Chromogenic in situ hybridisation (CISH) should be an accepted method in the routine diagnostic evaluation of HER2 status in breast cancer.

Authors:  S Di Palma; N Collins; C Faulkes; B Ping; G Ferns; B Haagsma; G Layer; M W Kissin; M G Cook
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Comparison of liquid based cytology and histology for the evaluation of HER-2 status using immunostaining and CISH in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  H Sartelet; E Lagonotte; M Lorenzato; I Duval; C Lechki; C Rigaud; J Cucherousset; A Durlach; O Graesslin; P Abboud; M Doco-Fenzy; C Quereux; B Costa; M Polette; J-N Munck; P Birembaut
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Prospective multi-centre study to validate chromogenic in situ hybridisation for the assessment of HER2 gene amplification in specimens from adjuvant and metastatic breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Sabine Riethdorf; Bernhard Hoegel; Birgit John; German Ott; Peter Fritz; Susanne Thon; Thomas Loening; Klaus Pantel
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  3-Phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1 potentiates upstream lesions on the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Matthew Maurer; Tao Su; Lao H Saal; Susan Koujak; Benjamin D Hopkins; Christina R Barkley; Jiaping Wu; Subhadra Nandula; Bhaskar Dutta; Yuli Xie; Y Rebecca Chin; Da-In Kim; Jennifer S Ferris; Sofia K Gruvberger-Saal; Mervi Laakso; Xiaomei Wang; Lorenzo Memeo; Albert Rojtman; Tulio Matos; Jennifer S Yu; Carlos Cordon-Cardo; Jorma Isola; Mary Beth Terry; Alex Toker; Gordon B Mills; Jean J Zhao; Vundavalli V V S Murty; Hanina Hibshoosh; Ramon Parsons
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Determination of HER2 amplification in primary breast cancer using dual-colour chromogenic in situ hybridization is comparable to fluorescence in situ hybridization: a European multicentre study involving 168 specimens.

Authors:  Tomás García-Caballero; Dorthe Grabau; Andrew R Green; John Gregory; Arno Schad; Elke Kohlwes; Ian O Ellis; Sarah Watts; Jens Mollerup
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 6.  Out of the darkness and into the light: bright field in situ hybridisation for delineation of ERBB2 (HER2) status in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Aaron M Gruver; Ziad Peerwani; Raymond R Tubbs
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  The epidermal growth factor receptor family in breast cancer.

Authors:  Angelos K Koutras; T R Jeffry Evans
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Accurate assessment of HER2 gene status for invasive component of breast cancer by combination of immunohistochemistry and chromogenic In Situ hybridization.

Authors:  Xiu Nie; Jun He; Yan Li; Dan-Zhen Pan; Hua-Xiong Pan; Mi-Xia Weng; Xiu-Ping Yang; Chun-Ping Liu; Tao Huang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2013-06-17

9.  Delineation of HER2 gene status in breast carcinoma by silver in situ hybridization is reproducible among laboratories and pathologists.

Authors:  Antonino Carbone; Gerardo Botti; Annunziata Gloghini; Gianni Simone; Mauro Truini; Maria Pia Curcio; Patrizia Gasparini; Anita Mangia; Tiziana Perin; Sandra Salvi; Adele Testi; Paolo Verderio
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 5.568

10.  HER-2 positive breast cancer: decreasing proportion but stable incidence in Finnish population from 1982 to 2005.

Authors:  Katri Köninki; Minna Tanner; Anssi Auvinen; Jorma Isola
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.