Literature DB >> 15268918

Behavioural and physiological impairments of sustained attention after traumatic brain injury.

Paul M Dockree1, Simon P Kelly, Richard A P Roche, Michael J Hogan, Richard B Reilly, Ian H Robertson.   

Abstract

Sustaining attention under conditions of low external demand taxes our ability to stay on task and to avoid more appealing trains of thought or environmental distractions. By contrast, a stimulating, novel environment engages attention far more freely without the subjective feeling of having to override monotony. Our ability to maintain a goal-directed focus without support from the environment requires the endogenous control of behaviour. This control can be modulated by fronto-parietal circuits and this ability is compromised following traumatic brain injury (TBI) leading to increased lapses of attention. In this paper, we further explore a laboratory paradigm that we argue is particularly sensitive to sustained attention as opposed to other aspects of attentional control involving the selection and management of goals in working memory. The paradigm (fixed sequence Sustained Attention to Response Task--SARTfixed) involves withholding a key press to an infrequent no-go target embedded within a predictable sequence of numbers. We demonstrate that TBI patients in this study make disproportionately more errors than controls on this task. An analysis of response times (RTs) and EEG alpha power across the task demonstrates group differences preceding the critical no-go trial. Controls demonstrate a lengthening of RTs accompanied by desynchronization of power within the alpha band (approximately 10 Hz) preceding the no-go trial. Conversely, the TBI group showed a shortening of RTs during this period with no evidence of alpha desynchronization. These findings suggest that TBI patients may have dysfunctional alpha generators as a consequence of their injury that impairs endogenous control during the task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15268918     DOI: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.03.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  33 in total

1.  Text-speak processing and the sustained attention to response task.

Authors:  James Head; Paul N Russell; Martin J Dorahy; Ewald Neumann; William S Helton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Brief mental breaks and content-free cues may not keep you focused.

Authors:  William S Helton; Paul N Russell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Event-related induced frontal alpha as a marker of lateral prefrontal cortex activation during cognitive reappraisal.

Authors:  Muhammad A Parvaz; Annmarie MacNamara; Rita Z Goldstein; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Practice does not make perfect in a modified sustained attention to response task.

Authors:  James Head; William S Helton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Working memory load and the vigilance decrement.

Authors:  William S Helton; Paul N Russell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Reliable- and unreliable-warning cues in the Sustained Attention to Response Task.

Authors:  William S Helton; James Head; Paul N Russell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Energetic effects of stimulus intensity on prolonged simple reaction-time performance.

Authors:  Robert Langner; Klaus Willmes; Anjan Chatterjee; Simon B Eickhoff; Walter Sturm
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-02-10

8.  The effects of warning cues and attention-capturing stimuli on the sustained attention to response task.

Authors:  Kristin M Finkbeiner; Kyle M Wilson; Paul N Russell; William S Helton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Sustained attention in traumatic brain injury (TBI) and healthy controls: enhanced sensitivity with dual-task load.

Authors:  Paul M Dockree; Mark A Bellgrove; Fiadhnait M O'Keeffe; Pauline Moloney; Lina Aimola; Simone Carton; Ian H Robertson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-26       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Early sensory processing deficits predict sensitivity to distraction in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Jason Smucny; Ann Olincy; Lindsay C Eichman; Emma Lyons; Jason R Tregellas
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 4.939

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.