Literature DB >> 1526866

The prediction of human tumor radiosensitivity in situ: an approach using chromosome aberrations detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

J M Brown1, J Evans, M S Kovacs.   

Abstract

No method of predicting the radiation sensitivity of individual human tumors is presently available, and recently published data show that other factors, in addition to the intrinsic radiosensitivity of the tumor cells, may play a role in the in vivo response of human tumors. Since these factors likely involve the tumor milieu (e.g., cell-cell contact and tumor hypoxia), an in situ assay of radiosensitivity is required. Although an analysis based on chromosome damage is the only suitable assay that would fit the requirements of sensitivity and speed of analysis, conventional examination of chromosome damage is impractical. By allowing the visualization of chromosomes in interphase cells, the technique of premature chromosome condensation (PCC) overcomes the need to culture the tumor cells in vitro, but the technical problem remains of counting a small excess number of breaks over the often large pretreatment chromosome number. We demonstrate here that the combination of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with PCC enormously simplifies the problem by focusing the analysis on a single chromosome. It also allows exchange aberrations to be scored easily. We demonstrate that the FISH technology may also be used to estimate radiation sensitivity from stable reciprocal translocations in metaphase identified by combining whole chromosome painting with a second color hybridization to the repeat sequences common to the centromeres. Since the frequency of stable translocations should correlate with initial chromosome damage, and since these translocations are not preferentially lost from the irradiated tumor cell population by cell death, an estimate of tumor cell killing following 1-5 dose fractions should be possible. Each of these two methods has its advantages, and a careful study of the two should establish which is superior for routine use to determine tumor radiosensitivity in situ.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1526866     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(92)90682-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  8 in total

Review 1.  Genetic and epigenetic features in radiation sensitivity. Part II: implications for clinical practice and radiation protection.

Authors:  Michel H Bourguignon; Pablo A Gisone; Maria R Perez; Severino Michelin; Diana Dubner; Marina Di Giorgio; Edgardo D Carosella
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Next generation platforms for high-throughput biodosimetry.

Authors:  Mikhail Repin; Helen C Turner; Guy Garty; David J Brenner
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  Correlation of Nuclear Morphometry and AgNOR Score with Radiation Response in Squamous Cell Cancers of the Head and Neck: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Biswa Mohan Biswal; Nor Hayati Othman
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2010-07

4.  Chromosomal in-vitro radiosensitivity of lymphocytes in radiotherapy patients and AT-homozygotes.

Authors:  J Dunst; S Neubauer; A Becker; E Gebhart
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  The contribution of DNA ploidy to radiation sensitivity in human tumour cell lines.

Authors:  J L Schwartz; J Murnane; R R Weichselbaum
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 6.  Application of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) Technique for the Detection of Genetic Aberration in Medical Science.

Authors:  Zubair Ahmed Ratan; Sojib Bin Zaman; Varshil Mehta; Mohammad Faisal Haidere; Nusrat Jahan Runa; Nasrin Akter
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-06-09

7.  Clinical, molecular- and cytogenetic analysis of a case of severe radio-sensitivity.

Authors:  K M Greulich-Bode; F Zimmermann; W-U Müller; B Pakisch; M Molls; F Würschmidt
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.236

8.  γ-H2AX Foci Persistence at Chromosome Break Suggests Slow and Faithful Repair Phases Restoring Chromosome Integrity.

Authors:  Michelle Ricoul; Tamizh Selvan Gnana Sekaran; Patricia Brochard; Cecile Herate; Laure Sabatier
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 6.639

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.