Literature DB >> 15266438

Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures.

B Stevens, J Yamada, A Ohlsson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Management of pain for neonates is less than optimal. The administration of sucrose with and without non-nutritive sucking (pacifiers) has been the most frequently studied non-pharmacological intervention for relief of procedural pain in neonates.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy, effect of dose, and safety of sucrose for relieving procedural pain as assessed by validated individual pain indicators and composite pain scores. SEARCH STRATEGY: Standard methods as per the Neonatal Collaborative Review Group. A MEDLINE search was carried out for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from January 1966 - March 2004, EMBASE from 1980-2004 and search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2004). Key words and (MeSH) terms included infant/newborn, pain, analgesia and sucrose. Language restrictions were not imposed. Bibliographies, personal files, the most recent relevant neonatal and pain journals and recent major pediatric pain conference proceedings were searched manually. Unpublished studies, or studies reported only as abstracts, were not included. Additional information from published studies was obtained. SELECTION CRITERIA: RCTs in which term and/or preterm neonates (postnatal age maximum of 28 days after reaching 40 weeks corrected gestational age) received sucrose via oral syringe, NG-tube, dropper or pacifier for procedural pain from heel lance or venepuncture. In the control group, water, pacifier or positioning/containing were used. Studies in which the painful stimulus was circumcision were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trial quality was assessed according to the methods of the Neonatal Collaborative Review Group. Quality measures included blinding of randomization, blinding of intervention, completeness of follow up and blinding of outcome measurement. Data were abstracted and independently checked for accuracy by the three investigators. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The statistical package (RevMan 4.2) of the Cochrane Collaboration was used. For meta-analysis, a weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the fixed effects model was reported for continuous outcome measures. MAIN
RESULTS: Forty-four studies were identified for possible inclusion in this review. Seven studies reported only as abstracts, and sixteen additional studies were excluded, leaving 21 studies (1,616 infants) included in this review. Sucrose in a wide variety of dosages was generally found to decrease physiologic (heart rate) and behavioural (the mean percent time crying, total cry duration, duration of first cry, and facial action) pain indicators and composite pain scores in neonates undergoing heel stick or venepuncture. When pain scores (Premature Infant Pain Profiles) were pooled across 3 studies (Gibbins 2001; Johnston 1999a; Stevens 1999), they were significantly reduced in infants who were given sucrose (dose range 0.012 g to 0.12 g) compared to the control group, [WMD -1.64 (95% CI -2.47,- 0.81); p = 0.0001] at 30 seconds and [WMD -2.05, (95% CI -3.08, -1.02); p = 0.00010] at 60 seconds after heel lance. When results for change in heart rate were pooled for two studies (Haouari 1995, Isik 2000), there were no significant differences between changes in heart rate for infants given sucrose (dose range 0.5 g to 0.6 g) compared to the control group, [WMD 0.90 (95% CI -5.81, 7.61); p = 0.8] at one minute and [WMD -6.20 (95% CI -15.27, 2.88); p = 0.18] at three minutes after heel lance. REVIEWERS'
CONCLUSIONS: Sucrose is safe and effective for reducing procedural pain from single painful events (heel lance, venepuncture). There was inconsistency in the dose of sucrose that was effective (dose range of 0.012 g to 0.12 g), and therefore an optimal dose to be used in preterm and/or term infants could not be identified. The use of repeated administrations of sucrose in neonates needs to be investigated as does the use of sucrose in combination with other behavioural (e.g., facilitated tucking, kangaroo care) and pharmacologic (e.g., morphine, fentanyl) interventions. Use of sucrose in neonates who are of very low birth weight, unstable and/or ventilated also needs to be addressed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15266438     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001069.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  35 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacological therapy for analgesia and sedation in the newborn.

Authors:  K J S Anand; R W Hall
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  Bacterial contamination of oral sucrose solutions.

Authors:  Denise M Harrison; Andrew J Daley; Karen Rautenbacher; Peter M Loughnan; Elizabeth Manias; Linda J Johnston
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  Interventions for paediatric procedure-related pain in primary care.

Authors:  Jill E Maclaren; Lindsey L Cohen
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 4.  A review of systematic reviews on pain interventions in hospitalized infants.

Authors:  J Yamada; J Stinson; J Lamba; A Dickson; P J McGrath; B Stevens
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.037

5.  Should an IRB approve a placebo-controlled randomized trial of analgesia for procedural pain in neonates?

Authors:  Carlo V Bellieni; Anna Taddio; Jenni S Linebarger; John D Lantos
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Co-bedding as a Comfort measure For Twins undergoing painful procedures (CComForT Trial).

Authors:  Marsha L Campbell-Yeo; C Celeste Johnston; Ks Joseph; Nancy L Feeley; Christine T Chambers; Keith J Barrington
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 2.125

7.  Evidence and consensus-based German guidelines for the management of analgesia, sedation and delirium in intensive care--short version.

Authors:  Jörg Martin; Anja Heymann; Katrin Bäsell; Ralf Baron; Rolf Biniek; Hartmut Bürkle; Peter Dall; Christine Dictus; Verena Eggers; Ingolf Eichler; Lothar Engelmann; Lars Garten; Wolfgang Hartl; Ulrike Haase; Ralf Huth; Paul Kessler; Stefan Kleinschmidt; Wolfgang Koppert; Franz-Josef Kretz; Heinz Laubenthal; Guenter Marggraf; Andreas Meiser; Edmund Neugebauer; Ulrike Neuhaus; Christian Putensen; Michael Quintel; Alexander Reske; Bernard Roth; Jens Scholz; Stefan Schröder; Dierk Schreiter; Jürgen Schüttler; Gerhard Schwarzmann; Robert Stingele; Peter Tonner; Philip Tränkle; Rolf Detlef Treede; Tomislav Trupkovic; Michael Tryba; Frank Wappler; Christian Waydhas; Claudia Spies
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2010-02-02

8.  Optimizing hand-held spectral domain optical coherence tomography imaging for neonates, infants, and children.

Authors:  Ramiro S Maldonado; Joseph A Izatt; Neeru Sarin; David K Wallace; Sharon Freedman; C Michael Cotten; Cynthia A Toth
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Oral sucrose and a pacifier for pain relief during simple procedures in preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Fathia A Elserafy; Saad A Alsaedi; Julita Louwrens; Bakr Bin Sadiq; Ali Y Mersal
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.526

10.  Heel lance in newborn during breastfeeding: an evaluation of analgesic effect of this procedure.

Authors:  Elena Uga; Manuela Candriella; Antonella Perino; Viviana Alloni; Giuseppina Angilella; Michela Trada; Anna Maria Ziliotto; Maura Barbara Rossi; Danila Tozzini; Clelia Tripaldi; Michela Vaglio; Luigina Grossi; Michaela Allen; Sandro Provera
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 2.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.