Literature DB >> 15266243

Underreporting of minor transfusion reactions in cancer patients.

Aida B Narvios1, Benjamin Lichtiger, Joyce L Neumann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Minor adverse reactions following transfusion of blood components to cancer patients are not uncommon. Reporting these minor reactions to the transfusion service needs a careful evaluation. The objectives of this study were to closely monitor the transfusion reactions that occurred and had not been reported to the transfusion service and to evaluate the process by which the medical and nursing staff recognized and managed these reactions.
METHODS: We prepared a questionnaire with the nursing staff of a selected inpatient unit that addressed important questions, such as signs and symptoms during the transfusion, premedications given, process for physician notification, recommended action, and blood component implicated. Charts of the patients were reviewed, and the process was monitored for a 6-month period.
RESULTS: A total of 58 cases were completed and analyzed. Platelet concentrates were transfused in 43 cases (74.1%), packed red blood cells in 9 cases (15.6%), and fresh frozen plasma in 6 cases (10.3%). Minor adverse reactions that were documented included chills in 11 cases (19.0%), low-grade fever in 11 cases (19.0%), hives and itching in 24 cases (41.4%), nausea and vomiting in 1 case (1.7%), and headaches and nonspecific mild pains in 11 cases (19.0%). Transfusions had been resumed in 27 cases (46.6%) and stopped completely in 13 cases (22.4%). Twenty-seven of 58 (46.6%) were first-time events.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that underreporting of minor transfusion reactions, such as a febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reaction and allergic reactions, exists. To ensure safety to our cancer patients who are transfusion-dependent, we suggest that careful evaluation of any suspected transfusion reaction event should be referred to the transfusion medicine physicians who will evaluate each case and discuss it with the attending physician. This process will prevent detrimental, acute transfusion reactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15266243      PMCID: PMC1395759     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MedGenMed        ISSN: 1531-0132


  8 in total

1.  Practice parameter for the recognition, management, and prevention of adverse consequences of blood transfusion. College of American Pathologists.

Authors:  K Sazama; P J DeChristopher; R Dodd; C R Harrison; I A Shulman; E S Cooper; R J Labotka; H A Oberman; C M Zahn; A G Greenburg; L Stehling; K J Lauenstein; T H Price; L K Williams
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.534

2.  Prevalence of platelet transfusion reactions before and after implementation of leukocyte-depleted platelet concentrates by filtration.

Authors:  L T Goodnough; J Riddell; H Lazarus; T L Chafel; G Prince; D Hendrix; R Yomtovian
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.144

3.  Hemolytic transfusion reactions in oncology patients: experience in a large cancer center.

Authors:  B Lichtiger; E Perry-Thornton
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Febrile transfusion reaction: what blood component should be given next?

Authors:  J E Menitove; M C McElligott; R H Aster
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.144

5.  Limited efficacy of leukopoor platelets for prevention of febrile transfusion reactions.

Authors:  M M Mangano; L A Chambers; M S Kruskall
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  A prospective study to identify the risk factors associated with acute reactions to platelet and red cell transfusions.

Authors:  N M Heddle; L N Klama; L Griffith; R Roberts; G Shukla; J G Kelton
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  Transfusion reactions in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Y O Huh; B Lichtiger
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 2.493

8.  Febrile reactions after platelet transfusion: the effect of single versus multiple donors.

Authors:  L A Chambers; M S Kruskall; D G Pacini; L M Donovan
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.157

  8 in total
  6 in total

1.  Active Hemovigilance Significantly Improves Reporting of Acute Non-infectious Adverse Reactions to Blood Transfusion.

Authors:  Naveen Agnihotri; Ajju Agnihotri
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 0.900

2.  Transfusion reactions in pediatric and adolescent young adult haematology oncology and immune effector cell patients.

Authors:  Mira A Kohorst; Sajad J Khazal; Priti Tewari; Demetrios Petropoulos; Benjamin Mescher; Jian Wang; Kris M Mahadeo; James M Kelley
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2020-09-09

3.  Blood transfusion safety: A study of adverse reactions at the blood bank of a tertiary care center.

Authors:  Gita Negi; Dushyant Singh Gaur; Rajveer Kaur
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2015-10-29

4.  Retrospective evaluation of adverse transfusion reactions following blood product transfusion from a tertiary care hospital: A preliminary step towards hemovigilance.

Authors:  Praveen Kumar; Rakesh Thapliyal; Poonam Coshic; Kabita Chatterjee
Journal:  Asian J Transfus Sci       Date:  2013-07

5.  Blood transfusion reactions in elderly patients hospitalized in a multilevel geriatric hospital.

Authors:  E Lubart; R Segal; N Tryhub; E Sigler; A Leibovitz
Journal:  J Aging Res       Date:  2014-04-03

6.  Transfusion-related adverse reactions in pediatric and surgical patients at a tertiary care teaching hospital in India.

Authors:  Kunal J Ghataliya; Jigar D Kapadia; Mira K Desai; K M Mehariya; G H Rathod; Nidhi Bhatnagar; M D Gajjar
Journal:  Asian J Transfus Sci       Date:  2017 Jul-Dec
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.