Literature DB >> 15266165

The Minimum Data Set bedfast quality indicator: differences among nursing homes.

Barbara M Bates-Jensen1, Cathy A Alessi, Mary Cadogan, Lené Levy-Storms, Jennifer Jorge, June Yoshii, Nahla R Al-Samarrai, John F Schnelle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Excessive time in bed has negative effects on both physical conditioning and functioning. There are no data or practice guidelines relevant to how nurses should manage the in-bed times of nursing home residents, although all nursing homes receive a bedfast prevalence quality indicator report generated from the Minimum Data Set.
OBJECTIVES: To compare nursing homes that score in the upper and lower quartiles on the Minimum Data Set bedfast prevalence quality indicator for proportion of bedfast residents, activity and mobility nursing care, and amount of time all residents spend in bed, and to evaluate whether residents who spend more time in bed are different from those who spend less time in bed according to functional measures.
METHODS: A cohort design used medical records, resident interviews, and direct observation data to compare 15 nursing homes (n = 451 residents) on the proportion of bedfast residents, the amount of time residents spent in bed, the frequency of activity, and the scores on six activity and mobility care process indicators.
RESULTS: Significant differences were found between upper (i.e., higher prevalence of bedfast residents) and lower quartile nursing homes in the proportion of time residents were observed in bed (43% vs. 34%, respectively; p =.007), and in the proportion of residents who spent more than 22 hours in bed per day (18% vs. 8%, respectively; p =.002). All nursing homes underestimated the number of bedfast residents. The residents of upper quartile homes showed more activity episodes and reported receiving more walking assistance than the residents of lower quartile homes. DISCUSSION: Minimum Data Set bedfast quality indicator identified nursing homes in which residents spent more time in bed, but did not reflect differences in activity and mobility care. In fact, upper quartile homes provided more activity and mobility care than lower quartile homes. Across all the nursing homes, most of the residents spent at least 17 hours a day in bed. Further study of activity and mobility care and bedfast outcomes in nursing homes is needed, and nurses need to note the amount of time nursing home residents spend in bed.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15266165     DOI: 10.1097/00006199-200407000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Res        ISSN: 0029-6562            Impact factor:   2.381


  13 in total

1.  A New Adaptive Home-based Exercise Technology among Older Adults Living in Nursing Home: A Pilot Study on Feasibility, Acceptability and Physical Performance.

Authors:  V Valiani; M Lauzé; D Martel; M Pahor; T M Manini; S Anton; M Aubertin-Leheudre
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.075

Review 2.  Effects of interventions on physical activity in nursing home residents.

Authors:  Carl-Philipp Jansen; Katrin Claßen; Hans-Werner Wahl; Klaus Hauer
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2015-05-08

3.  Whole-body Vibration Training in Frail, Skilled Nursing Home Residents.

Authors:  Brandon F Grubbs; Arturo Figueroa; Jeong-Su Kim; Robert J Contreras; Karla Schmitt; Lynn B Panton
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2020-02-01

4.  Activity Engagement: Perspectives from Nursing Home Residents with Dementia.

Authors:  Sunghee H Tak; Satish Kedia; Tera Marie Tongumpun; Song Hee Hong
Journal:  Educ Gerontol       Date:  2015-03

Review 5.  The Resident Assessment Instrument-Minimum Data Set 2.0 quality indicators: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alison M Hutchinson; Doris L Milke; Suzanne Maisey; Cynthia Johnson; Janet E Squires; Gary Teare; Carole A Estabrooks
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Where should Momma go? Current nursing home performance measurement strategies and a less ambitious approach.

Authors:  Charles D Phillips; Catherine Hawes; Trudy Lieberman; Mary Jane Koren
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-06-25       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Assessing the effect of a physical activity intervention in a nursing home ecology: a natural lab approach.

Authors:  Carl-Philipp Jansen; Katrin Claßen; Klaus Hauer; Mona Diegelmann; Hans-Werner Wahl
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.921

8.  Differences in quality of life in home-dwelling persons and nursing home residents with dementia - a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Christine Olsen; Ingeborg Pedersen; Astrid Bergland; Marie-José Enders-Slegers; Nina Jøranson; Giovanna Calogiuri; Camilla Ihlebæk
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 3.921

9.  TEAM-UP for quality: a cluster randomized controlled trial protocol focused on preventing pressure ulcers through repositioning frequency and precipitating factors.

Authors:  Tracey L Yap; Susan M Kennerly; Susan D Horn; Nancy Bergstrom; Santanu Datta; Cathleen Colon-Emeric
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 3.921

Review 10.  Setting-related influences on physical inactivity of older adults in residential care settings: a review.

Authors:  Johanna G Douma; Karin M Volkers; Gwenda Engels; Marieke H Sonneveld; Richard H M Goossens; Erik J A Scherder
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 3.921

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.