Literature DB >> 15265794

Differences in the chromatin structure and cis-element organization of the human and mouse GATA1 loci: implications for cis-element identification.

Veronica Valverde-Garduno1, Boris Guyot, Eduardo Anguita, Isla Hamlett, Catherine Porcher, Paresh Vyas.   

Abstract

Cis-element identification is a prerequisite to understand transcriptional regulation of gene loci. From analysis of a limited number of conserved gene loci, sequence comparison has proved a robust and efficient way to locate cis-elements. Human and mouse GATA1 genes encode a critical hematopoietic transcription factor conserved in expression and function. Proper control of GATA1 transcription is critical in regulating myeloid lineage specification and maturation. Here, we compared sequence and systematically mapped position of DNase I hypersensitive sites, acetylation status of histone H3/H4, and in vivo binding of transcription factors over approximately 120 kilobases flanking the human GATA1 gene and the corresponding region in mice. Despite lying in approximately 10 megabase (Mb) conserved syntenic segment, the chromatin structures of the 2 homologous loci are strikingly different. The 2 previously unidentified hematopoietic cis-elements, one in each species, are not conserved in position and sequence and have enhancer activity in erythroid cells. In vivo, they both bind the transcription factors GATA1, SCL, LMO2, and Ldb1. More broadly, there are both species- and regulatory element-specific patterns of transcription factor binding. These findings suggest that some cis-elements regulating human and mouse GATA1 genes differ. More generally, mouse human sequence comparison may fail to identify all cis-elements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15265794     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2004-04-1333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  31 in total

1.  GATA1 function, a paradigm for transcription factors in hematopoiesis.

Authors:  Rita Ferreira; Kinuko Ohneda; Masayuki Yamamoto; Sjaak Philipsen
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  ESPERR: learning strong and weak signals in genomic sequence alignments to identify functional elements.

Authors:  James Taylor; Svitlana Tyekucheva; David C King; Ross C Hardison; Webb Miller; Francesca Chiaromonte
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Characterization of megakaryocyte GATA1-interacting proteins: the corepressor ETO2 and GATA1 interact to regulate terminal megakaryocyte maturation.

Authors:  Isla Hamlett; Julia Draper; John Strouboulis; Francisco Iborra; Catherine Porcher; Paresh Vyas
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 4.  Mast cell transcriptional networks.

Authors:  Clifford M Takemoto; Youl-Nam Lee; Anil G Jegga; Daniella Zablocki; Stephanie Brandal; Amir Shahlaee; Suming Huang; Ying Ye; Sivakumar Gowrisankar; Jimmy Huynh; Michael A McDevitt
Journal:  Blood Cells Mol Dis       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  SCL and associated proteins distinguish active from repressive GATA transcription factor complexes.

Authors:  Tamara Tripic; Wulan Deng; Yong Cheng; Ying Zhang; Christopher R Vakoc; Gregory D Gregory; Ross C Hardison; Gerd A Blobel
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Gata1 expression driven by the alternative HS2 enhancer in the spleen rescues the hematopoietic failure induced by the hypomorphic Gata1low mutation.

Authors:  Anna Rita Migliaccio; Fabrizio Martelli; Maria Verrucci; Massimo Sanchez; Mauro Valeri; Giovanni Migliaccio; Alessandro Maria Vannucchi; Maria Zingariello; Angela Di Baldassarre; Barbara Ghinassi; Rosa Alba Rana; Yvette van Hensbergen; Willem E Fibbe
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Transcriptional enhancement by GATA1-occupied DNA segments is strongly associated with evolutionary constraint on the binding site motif.

Authors:  Yong Cheng; David C King; Louis C Dore; Xinmin Zhang; Yuepin Zhou; Ying Zhang; Christine Dorman; Demesew Abebe; Swathi A Kumar; Francesca Chiaromonte; Webb Miller; Roland D Green; Mitchell J Weiss; Ross C Hardison
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  GFI1B controls its own expression binding to multiple sites.

Authors:  Eduardo Anguita; Ana Villegas; Francisco Iborra; Aurora Hernández
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 9.941

9.  Finding cis-regulatory elements using comparative genomics: some lessons from ENCODE data.

Authors:  David C King; James Taylor; Ying Zhang; Yong Cheng; Heather A Lawson; Joel Martin; Francesca Chiaromonte; Webb Miller; Ross C Hardison
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  28-way vertebrate alignment and conservation track in the UCSC Genome Browser.

Authors:  Webb Miller; Kate Rosenbloom; Ross C Hardison; Minmei Hou; James Taylor; Brian Raney; Richard Burhans; David C King; Robert Baertsch; Daniel Blankenberg; Sergei L Kosakovsky Pond; Anton Nekrutenko; Belinda Giardine; Robert S Harris; Svitlana Tyekucheva; Mark Diekhans; Thomas H Pringle; William J Murphy; Arthur Lesk; George M Weinstock; Kerstin Lindblad-Toh; Richard A Gibbs; Eric S Lander; Adam Siepel; David Haussler; W James Kent
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 9.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.