| Literature DB >> 15265235 |
Alexander L Coon1, Geoffrey P Colby, William J Mack, Lei Feng, Philip Meyers, E Sander Connolly.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite improvements in the safety and efficacy of endovascular procedures, considerable morbidity may still be attributed to vasospasm. Vasospasm has proven amenable to pharmacological intervention such as nitrates, intravenous calcium channel blockers (CCBs), and intra-arterial papaverine, particularly in small vessels. However, few studies have focused on medium to large vessel spasm. Here we report the use of an intra-arterial CCB, verapamil, to treat flow-limiting mechanically-induced spasm of the common carotid artery (CCA) in a primate. We believe this to be the first such report of its kind. CASEEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2004 PMID: 15265235 PMCID: PMC499548 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2261-4-11
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord ISSN: 1471-2261 Impact factor: 2.298
Figure 1Anterior-posterior angiogram of right common carotid artery injection of a Papio anubis with a 6 Fr catheter in place both (A.) during vessel spasm on catheter, and (B.) 10 minutes after infusion of intraluminal verapamil (2 mg). Overlay images showing 6 Fr catheter position in CCA (gold) during spasm (C.) and after alleviation with verapamil (D.). Arrows (→) indicate tip of catheter.
Figure 2Image analysis at 6 paired positions (Lines A-F) along catheter in common carotid artery both (A.) during vessel spasm, and (B.) 10 minutes after intraluminal verapamil (2 mg) administration. (C.) Raw data table includes vessel diameter measurements both pre and post-verapamil injection.
Figure 3(A.) Bar graph depicting both the pre and post-verapamil mean vessel diameters from six positions along the length of the common carotid artery (CCA) (2.85 ± 0.14 mm and 3.45 ± 0.18 mm, respectively), and (B.) cross-sectional areas (6.41 ± 0.61 mm2 and 9.39 ± 1.0 mm2, respectively). Note the 46.7% increase in mean cross-sectional area after verapamil administration.