Literature DB >> 15264791

Minimally invasive spinal surgery: a historical perspective.

Issada Thongtrangan1, Hoang Le, Jon Park, Daniel H Kim.   

Abstract

The concept of minimally invasive spinal surgery embodies the goal of achieving clinical outcomes comparable to those of conventional open surgery, while minimizing the risk of iatrogenic injury that may be incurred during the exposure process. The development of microscopy, laser technology, endoscopy, and video and image guidance systems provided the foundation on which minimally invasive spinal surgery is based. Minimally invasive treatments have been undertaken in all areas of the spinal axis since the 20th century. Lumbar disc disease has been treated using chemonucleolysis, percutaneous discectomy, laser discectomy, intradiscal thermoablation, and minimally invasive microdiscectomy techniques. The initial use of thoracoscopy for thoracic discs and tumor biopsies has expanded to include deformity correction, sympathectomy, vertebrectomy with reconstruction and instrumentation, and resection of paraspinal neurogenic tumors. Laparoscopic techniques, such as those used for appendectomy or cholecystectomy by general surgeons, have evolved into procedures performed by spinal surgeons for anterior lumbar discectomy and fusion. Image-guided systems have been adapted to facilitate pedicle screw placement with increased accuracy. Over the past decade, minimally invasive treatment of cervical spinal disorders has become feasible by applying technologies similar to those developed for the thoracic and lumbar spine. Endoscope-assisted transoral surgery, cervical laminectomy, discectomy, and foraminotomy all represent the continual evolution of minimally invasive spinal surgery. Further improvement in optics and imaging resources, development of biological agents, and introduction of instrumentation systems designed for minimally invasive procedures will inevitably lead to further applications in minimally invasive spine surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15264791     DOI: 10.3171/foc.2004.16.1.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  14 in total

1.  Radiographic measurement for transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic approach (PELD).

Authors:  Yuvraj Hurday; Baoshan Xu; Lin Guo; Yi Cao; Yeda Wan; Hongfeng Jiang; Yue Liu; Qian Yang; Xinlong Ma
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy: a technical review.

Authors:  Javier Quillo-Olvera; Guang-Xun Lin; Jin-Sung Kim
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-03

3.  Percutaneous instrumentation of the cervical and cervico-thoracic spine using pedicle screws: preliminary clinical results and analysis of accuracy.

Authors:  Christian Schaefer; Phillip Begemann; Ina Fuhrhop; Malte Schroeder; Lennart Viezens; Lothar Wiesner; Nils Hansen-Algenstaedt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Less invasive approaches for the treatment of cervical schwannomas: our experience.

Authors:  S Raysi Dehcordi; S Marzi; A Ricci; F Di Cola; R J Galzio
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Endoscopic spinal tethered cord release: operative technique.

Authors:  Xiao Di
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  Surgeon Perceptions of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Jonathan Webb; Lionel Gottschalk; Yu-Po Lee; Steven Garfin; Choll Kim
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2008-09-01

7.  [Percutaneous fusion technique on the thoracolumbar spine with the Expedium LIS].

Authors:  Cornelius Wimmer
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.154

8.  Use of a quantitative pedicle screw accuracy system to assess new technology: Initial studies on O-arm navigation and its effect on the learning curve of percutaneous pedicle screw insertion.

Authors:  Joseph A Sclafani; Gilad J Regev; Jonathan Webb; Steven R Garfin; Choll W Kim
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2011-09-01

9.  Mast Quadrant-assisted minimally invasive modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: single incision versus double incision.

Authors:  Xin-Lei Xia; Hong-Li Wang; Fei-Zhou Lyu; Li-Xun Wang; Xiao-Sheng Ma; Jian-Yuan Jiang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-04-05       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 10.  The technological development of minimally invasive spine surgery.

Authors:  Laura A Snyder; John O'Toole; Kurt M Eichholz; Mick J Perez-Cruet; Richard Fessler
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.