Literature DB >> 15264647

Comparison of dental arch and alveolar widths of patients with Class II, division 1 malocclusion and subjects with Class I ideal occlusion.

M Ozgur Sayin1, Hakan Turkkahraman.   

Abstract

This study evaluates dental arch and alveolar widths of patients with Class II, division 1 malocclusion. Thirty female patients with Class II, division 1 malocclusion were compared with 30 female subjects with Class I ideal occlusion. Patients with posterior crossbites even in a single tooth were excluded from the study. According to our results, arch widths measured between maxillary second premolars and maxillary first molars were found narrower in the Class II, division 1 group, and mandibular intercanine widths were narrower in the Class I group. Interalveolar widths showed no difference between the groups. These results suggested that transverse discrepancy in Class II, division 1 patients originated from upper posterior teeth and not from the maxillary alveolar base. Therefore, slow maxillary expansion rather than rapid maxillary expansion may be considered before or during the treatment of Class II, division 1 patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15264647     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0356:CODAAA>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  15 in total

1.  Three-dimensional palatal anatomic characteristics' correlation with dermatoglyphic heterogeneity in Angle malocclusions.

Authors:  Ibrahim AlShahrani; Ali A Dawasaz; Sadatullah Syed; Mohammed Ibrahim; Rafi A Togoo
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Lateral cephalometric standards of Germans with normal occlusion from 6 to 17 years of age.

Authors:  F Stahl de Castrillon; T Baccetti; L Franchi; R Grabowski; U Klink-Heckmann; J A McNamara
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Dental archforms in dentoalveolar Class I, II and III.

Authors:  Martina Slaj; Stjepan Spalj; Dubravko Pavlin; Davor Illes; Mladen Slaj
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  The class II/1 anomaly of hereditary etiology vs. thumb-sucking etiology.

Authors:  H Pădure; A R Negru; D Stanciu
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2012-06-18

5.  Pathognomonic features of Angle's Class II division 2 malocclusion: A comparative cephalometric and arch width study.

Authors:  Singamsetty E R V Prasad; Ravikishore Reddy Indukuri; Rupesh Singh; Anitha Nooney; Firoz Babu Palagiri; Veera Narayana
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2014-12

6.  Diagnostic features of Angle's Class II div 2 malocclusion.

Authors:  Kiran Kumar Dodda; Singamsetty E R V Prasad; Ravi Krishna Kanuru; Siddhartha Nalluri; Radhika Mittapalli
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

7.  Comparison of arch width, alveolar width and buccolingual inclination of teeth between Class II division 1 malocclusion and Class I occlusion.

Authors:  Rui Shu; Xianglong Han; Yating Wang; Hui Xu; Dongqing Ai; Lufei Wang; Yeke Wu; Ding Bai
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Evaluation of arch width among Class I normal occlusion, Class II Division 1, Class II Division 2, and Class III malocclusion in Indian population.

Authors:  Dolly Patel; Falguni Mehta; Nimesh Patel; Nishit Mehta; Ipist Trivedi; Apexa Mehta
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2015-09

9.  Archform comparisons between skeletal class II and III malocclusions.

Authors:  Wei Zou; JiaQi Wu; JiuHui Jiang; TianMin Xu; CuiYing Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Correlation between dental arch width and sagittal dento-skeletal morphology in untreated adults.

Authors:  Atefe Saffar Shahroudi; Tahura Etezadi
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2013-11-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.