Literature DB >> 15262923

The sodium-driven flagellar motor controls exopolysaccharide expression in Vibrio cholerae.

Crystal M Lauriano1, Chandradipa Ghosh, Nidia E Correa, Karl E Klose.   

Abstract

Vibrio cholerae causes the life-threatening diarrheal disease cholera. This organism persists in aquatic environments in areas of endemicity, and it is believed that the ability of the bacteria to form biofilms in the environment contributes to their persistence. Expression of an exopolysaccharide (EPS), encoded by two vps gene clusters, is essential for biofilm formation and causes a rugose colonial phenotype. We previously reported that the lack of a flagellum induces V. cholerae EPS expression. To uncover the signaling pathway that links the lack of a flagellum to EPS expression, we introduced into a rugose flaA strain second-site mutations that would cause reversion back to the smooth phenotype. Interestingly, mutation of the genes encoding the sodium-driven motor (mot) in a nonflagellated strain reduces EPS expression, biofilm formation, and vps gene transcription, as does the addition of phenamil, which specifically inhibits the sodium-driven motor. Mutation of vpsR, which encodes a response regulator, also reduces EPS expression, biofilm formation, and vps gene transcription in nonflagellated cells. Complementation of a vpsR strain with a constitutive vpsR allele likely to mimic the phosphorylated state (D59E) restores EPS expression and biofilm formation, while complementation with an allele predicted to remain unphosphorylated (D59A) does not. Our results demonstrate the involvement of the sodium-driven motor and suggest the involvement of phospho-VpsR in the signaling cascade that induces EPS expression. A nonflagellated strain expressing EPS is defective for intestinal colonization in the suckling mouse model of cholera and expresses reduced amounts of cholera toxin and toxin-coregulated pili in vitro. Wild-type levels of virulence factor expression and colonization could be restored by a second mutation within the vps gene cluster that eliminated EPS biosynthesis. These results demonstrate a complex relationship between the flagellum-dependent EPS signaling cascade and virulence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15262923      PMCID: PMC451641          DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.15.4864-4874.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  44 in total

1.  Steps in the development of a Vibrio cholerae El Tor biofilm.

Authors:  P I Watnick; R Kolter
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.501

2.  Isolation and characterization of a temperature-sensitive generalized transducing bacteriophage for Vibrio cholerae.

Authors:  D L Hava; A Camilli
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.363

3.  Regulation and temporal expression patterns of Vibrio cholerae virulence genes during infection.

Authors:  S H Lee; D L Hava; M K Waldor; A Camilli
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1999-12-10       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  VpsR, a Member of the Response Regulators of the Two-Component Regulatory Systems, Is Required for Expression of vps Biosynthesis Genes and EPS(ETr)-Associated Phenotypes in Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor.

Authors:  F H Yildiz; N A Dolganov; G K Schoolnik
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  The absence of a flagellum leads to altered colony morphology, biofilm development and virulence in Vibrio cholerae O139.

Authors:  P I Watnick; C M Lauriano; K E Klose; L Croal; R Kolter
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.501

6.  Quorum-sensing regulators control virulence gene expression in Vibrio cholerae.

Authors:  Jun Zhu; Melissa B Miller; Russell E Vance; Michelle Dziejman; Bonnie L Bassler; John J Mekalanos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Phosphorylation of the flagellar regulatory protein FlrC is necessary for Vibrio cholerae motility and enhanced colonization.

Authors:  N E Correa; C M Lauriano; R McGee; K E Klose
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.501

8.  Vibrio cholerae CytR is a repressor of biofilm development.

Authors:  Adam J Haugo; Paula I Watnick
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.501

Review 9.  Vibrio cholerae and cholera: out of the water and into the host.

Authors:  Joachim Reidl; Karl E Klose
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 16.408

10.  DNA sequence of both chromosomes of the cholera pathogen Vibrio cholerae.

Authors:  J F Heidelberg; J A Eisen; W C Nelson; R A Clayton; M L Gwinn; R J Dodson; D H Haft; E K Hickey; J D Peterson; L Umayam; S R Gill; K E Nelson; T D Read; H Tettelin; D Richardson; M D Ermolaeva; J Vamathevan; S Bass; H Qin; I Dragoi; P Sellers; L McDonald; T Utterback; R D Fleishmann; W C Nierman; O White; S L Salzberg; H O Smith; R R Colwell; J J Mekalanos; J C Venter; C M Fraser
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-03       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  62 in total

1.  Vibrio cholerae biofilms: stuck between a rock and a hard place.

Authors:  Douglas M Heithoff; Michael J Mahan
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Characterization of Vibrio cholerae RyhB: the RyhB regulon and role of ryhB in biofilm formation.

Authors:  Alexandra R Mey; Stephanie A Craig; Shelley M Payne
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  Roles of the regulatory proteins FlhF and FlhG in the Vibrio cholerae flagellar transcription hierarchy.

Authors:  Nidia E Correa; Fen Peng; Karl E Klose
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 4.  Going against the grain: chemotaxis and infection in Vibrio cholerae.

Authors:  Susan M Butler; Andrew Camilli
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 60.633

5.  Holdfast formation in motile swarmer cells optimizes surface attachment during Caulobacter crescentus development.

Authors:  Assaf Levi; Urs Jenal
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Signals, regulatory networks, and materials that build and break bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  Ece Karatan; Paula Watnick
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 11.056

7.  Dynamics and control of biofilms of the oligotrophic bacterium Caulobacter crescentus.

Authors:  Plamena Entcheva-Dimitrov; Alfred M Spormann
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 8.  Vibrio biofilms: so much the same yet so different.

Authors:  Fitnat H Yildiz; Karen L Visick
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 17.079

9.  Phosphorylation-dependent derepression by the response regulator HnoC in the Shewanella oneidensis nitric oxide signaling network.

Authors:  Lars Plate; Michael A Marletta
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Lipidation of an FlrC-dependent protein is required for enhanced intestinal colonization by Vibrio cholerae.

Authors:  David C Morris; Fen Peng; Jeffrey R Barker; Karl E Klose
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 3.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.