Literature DB >> 15262669

Ethics in practice: managed care and the changing health care environment: medicine as a profession managed care ethics working group statement.

Gail J Povar1, Helen Blumen, John Daniel, Suzanne Daub, Lois Evans, Richard P Holm, Natalie Levkovich, Alice O McCarter, James Sabin, Lois Snyder, Daniel Sulmasy, Peter Vaughan, Laurence D Wellikson, Amy Campbell.   

Abstract

Cost pressures and changes in the health care environment pose ethical challenges and hard choices for patients, physicians, policymakers, and society. In 2000 and 2001, the American College of Physicians, with the Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Ethics Program, convened a working group of stakeholders--patients, physicians, and managed care representatives, along with medical ethicists--to develop a statement of ethics for managed care. The group explored the impact of a changing health care environment on patient-physician relationships and how to best apply the principles of professionalism in this environment. The statement that emerged offers guidance on preserving the patient-clinician relationship, patient rights and responsibilities, confidentiality and privacy, resource allocation and stewardship, the obligation of health plans to foster an ethical environment for the delivery of care, and the clinician's responsibility to individual patients, the community, and the public health, among other issues.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American College of Physicians; Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Health Care and Public Health; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15262669     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-2-200407200-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  8 in total

1.  Development of the objective structured system-interaction examination.

Authors:  Susan Hingle; Richard B Rosher; Sherry Robinson; Nancy McCann-Stone; Christine Todd; Michael Clark
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2009-09

2.  Exposing medical students to expanding populations.

Authors:  J J Lindenthal; J A DeLisa; G F Heinrich; W S Calderón Gerstein
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2015-03-19

Review 3.  Ethical Issues in the Design and Implementation of Population Health Programs.

Authors:  Matthew DeCamp; Daniel Pomerantz; Kamala Cotts; Elizabeth Dzeng; Neil Farber; Lisa Lehmann; P Preston Reynolds; Lois Snyder Sulmasy; Jon Tilburt
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Ethical issues in managing Lysosomal storage disorders in children in low and middle income countries.

Authors:  Bushra Afroze; Nick Brown
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.088

5.  The Predictors of Moral Sensitivity Among Physicians.

Authors:  Nada Alyousefi; Aljouhara Alibrahim; Haifaa Taleb; Lama Alotaibi; Leena Alrahmah; Noorah Aldubaib; Shahad Aljebreen; Norah Alrowais; Jamal Aljarallah
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-10-14

6.  Assessing a group of physicians' ethical sensitivity in Turkey.

Authors:  M Cetin; M Cimen
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 1.429

7.  High quality care and ethical pay-for-performance: a Society of General Internal Medicine policy analysis.

Authors:  J Frank Wharam; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Neil J Farber; Christine Sinsky; Lisa Rucker; Kimberly J Rask; M Kathleen Figaro; Clarence Braddock; Michael J Barry; Daniel P Sulmasy
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Doubly distributing special obligations: what professional practice can learn from parenting.

Authors:  Jon Tilburt; Baruch Brody
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 2.903

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.