Literature DB >> 15260198

The redundant target effect is affected by modality switch costs.

Matthias Gondan1, Kathrin Lange, Frank Rösler, Brigitte Röder.   

Abstract

When participants have to respond to stimuli of two modalities, faster reaction times are observed for simultaneous, bimodal events than for unimodal events (the redundant target effect [RTE]). This finding has been interpreted as reflecting processing gains for bimodal relative to unimodal stimuli, possibly due to multisensory interactions. In random stimulus sequences, reaction times are slower when the stimulus is preceded by a stimulus of a different modality (modality switch effect [MSE]). Simple reaction time redundant target experiments with auditory-visual, visual-tactile, and auditory-tactile stimulus combinations were run to determine whether the RTE may be partly explained by MSEs because bimodal stimuli do not require a modality switch. In all three modality pairings, significant MSEs and RTEs were observed. However, the RTE was still significant after reaction times were corrected for the MSE, supporting the hypothesis that coactivation occurs independently of modality switch costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15260198     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  9 in total

1.  Channel interaction and the redundant-targets effect in bimodal divided attention.

Authors:  J Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Statistical facilitation of simple reaction times.

Authors:  D H RAAB
Journal:  Trans N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1962-03

3.  Speeded responses to audiovisual signal changes result from bimodal integration.

Authors:  E Schröger; A Widmann
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Neural site of the redundant target effect electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  C Miniussi; M Girelli; C A Marzi
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Timecourse of coactivation in bimodal divided attention.

Authors:  J Miller
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-11

6.  Motor coactivation revealed by response force in divided and focused attention.

Authors:  M Giray; R Ulrich
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 7.  Visual dominance: an information-processing account of its origins and significance.

Authors:  M I Posner; M J Nissen; R M Klein
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Divided attention: evidence for coactivation with redundant signals.

Authors:  J Miller
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The cost of expecting events in the wrong sensory modality.

Authors:  C Spence; M E Nicholls; J Driver
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-02
  9 in total
  18 in total

1.  Effects of redundant auditory stimuli on reaction time.

Authors:  Hannes Schröter; Rolf Ulich; Jeff Miller
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-02

2.  Modality shift effects mimic multisensory interactions: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  Matthias Gondan; Dirk Vorberg; Mark W Greenlee
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Within- and Cross-Modal Integration and Attention in the Autism Spectrum.

Authors:  Geneviève Charbonneau; Armando Bertone; Marie Véronneau; Simon Girard; Maxime Pelland; Laurent Mottron; Franco Lepore; Olivier Collignon
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2020-01

4.  Multisensory aversive stimuli differentially modulate negative feelings in near and far space.

Authors:  Marine Taffou; Jan Ondřej; Carol O'Sullivan; Olivier Warusfel; Stéphanie Dubal; Isabelle Viaud-Delmon
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-05-05

5.  Audiovisual detection at different intensities and delays.

Authors:  Chandramouli Chandrasekaran; Steven P Blurton; Matthias Gondan
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 2.223

6.  Multisensory integration across the senses in young and old adults.

Authors:  Jeannette R Mahoney; Po Ching Clara Li; Mooyeon Oh-Park; Joe Verghese; Roee Holtzer
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Visual-somatosensory integration and balance: evidence for psychophysical integrative differences in aging.

Authors:  Jeannette R Mahoney; Roee Holtzer; Joe Verghese
Journal:  Multisens Res       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.286

Review 8.  Behavioral, perceptual, and neural alterations in sensory and multisensory function in autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Sarah H Baum; Ryan A Stevenson; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 11.685

9.  Visual-somatosensory integration in aging: does stimulus location really matter?

Authors:  Jeannette R Mahoney; Cuiling Wang; Kristina Dumas; Roee Holtzer
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.241

10.  Modality Switching in a Property Verification Task: An ERP Study of What Happens When Candles Flicker after High Heels Click.

Authors:  Jennifer Collins; Diane Pecher; René Zeelenberg; Seana Coulson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-02-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.