Literature DB >> 15259894

Genotypic determinants of the virological response to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-experienced patients.

Bernard Masquelier1, Catherine Tamalet, Brigitte Montès, Diane Descamps, Gilles Peytavin, Laurence Bocket, Marc Wirden, Jacques Izopet, Véronique Schneider, Virginie Ferré, Annick Ruffault, Pierre Palmer, Aldo Trylesinski, Michael Miller, Françoise Brun-Vézinet, Dominique Costagliola.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the genotypic determinants of the virological response to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in a multicentre cohort of antiretroviral (ARV)-experienced patients receiving TDF as a part of a salvage therapy.
METHODS: HIV-1 genotype was assessed at baseline in a subgroup of 161 patients of the French expanded access program receiving a stable TDF-including regimen for 3 months or more. Reverse transcriptase mutations associated with the viral load decrease at month 3 with a P-value <0.15 were retained for the construction of a mutation score. The score was then validated using a multivariate analysis and bootstrap resampling method.
RESULTS: The strongest association with decrease in viral load was observed with a set of seven mutations (TDF mutation score) that consisted of M41L, E44D, D67N, T69D/N/S, L74V, L210W and T215Y/F RT mutations. The RT K65R mutation and the insertions at codon 69 were not included in the analysis due to low prevalences. A TDF mutation score of < or = 2 predicted the absence of resistance to TDF and > or = 6 mutations predicted resistance to TDF with corresponding reductions in viral load of -1.3 +/- 1.1, and +0.1 +/- 0.7 log10 copies/ml, respectively. In patients with a TDF mutation score of 3-5, the decrease in viral load was -0.8 +/- 1.0 log10 copies/ml and was considered possibly resistant. In the multivariate analysis, a TDF mutation score > or = 6, previous use of amprenavir, indinavir and lopinavir, and co-prescription of didanosine were associated with a worse virological response. The bootstrap analysis showed the robustness of the TDF mutation score.
CONCLUSION: In ARV-experienced patients receiving TDF-containing regimens, a score derived from seven reverse transcriptase mutations was shown to be independently predictive of the virological response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15259894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antivir Ther        ISSN: 1359-6535


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of the precision and sensitivity of the Antivirogram and PhenoSense HIV drug susceptibility assays.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Soo-Yon Rhee; Jonathan Taylor; Robert W Shafer
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 3.731

2.  HIV-1 Protease and reverse-transcriptase mutations: correlations with antiretroviral therapy in subtype B isolates and implications for drug-resistance surveillance.

Authors:  Soo-Yon Rhee; W Jeffrey Fessel; Andrew R Zolopa; Leo Hurley; Tommy Liu; Jonathan Taylor; Dong Phuong Nguyen; Sally Slome; Daniel Klein; Michael Horberg; Jason Flamm; Stephen Follansbee; Jonathan M Schapiro; Robert W Shafer
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2005-07-05       Impact factor: 5.226

3.  Web resources for HIV type 1 genotypic-resistance test interpretation.

Authors:  Tommy F Liu; Robert W Shafer
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related virus is susceptible to AZT.

Authors:  Ryuta Sakuma; Toshie Sakuma; Seiga Ohmine; Robert H Silverman; Yasuhiro Ikeda
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.616

5.  Standardized representation, visualization and searchable repository of antiretroviral treatment-change episodes.

Authors:  Soo-Yon Rhee; Jose Luis Blanco; Tommy F Liu; Iñaki Pere; Rolf Kaiser; Maurizio Zazzi; Francesca Incardona; William Towner; Josep Maria Gatell; Andrea De Luca; W Jeffrey Fessel; Robert W Shafer
Journal:  AIDS Res Ther       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 2.250

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.