PURPOSE: A penicillin allergy skin-testing service run by pharmacists is described. SUMMARY: A board-certified allergist trained pharmacists at a tertiary care teaching hospital to administer penicillin allergy skin tests and interpret the results. A major objective of the service was to avoid unnecessary use of vancomycin and quinolones in patients claiming but not actually having a penicillin allergy. Patients with a severe type I reaction to penicillin during the preceding five years, patients with a confirmed history of a type II-IV reaction to penicillin, and severely immunosuppressed patients were not eligible for testing. As of July 2003, 26 patients had been enrolled in the service. A type I penicillin reaction was ruled out by the drug allergy history for 3 patients. The results were negative in 22 of the 23 patients who received skin testing, and in 1 the result was indeterminate. A penicillin or a beta-lactam antibiotic was administered to all 26 patients. No patient had a significant adverse reaction to skin testing or drug administration. CONCLUSION: A pharmacist-managed penicillin allergy skin-testing service was well received by physicians and showed potential to avoid unnecessary use of alternative antibiotics.
PURPOSE: A penicillinallergy skin-testing service run by pharmacists is described. SUMMARY: A board-certified allergist trained pharmacists at a tertiary care teaching hospital to administer penicillinallergy skin tests and interpret the results. A major objective of the service was to avoid unnecessary use of vancomycin and quinolones in patients claiming but not actually having a penicillinallergy. Patients with a severe type I reaction to penicillin during the preceding five years, patients with a confirmed history of a type II-IV reaction to penicillin, and severely immunosuppressed patients were not eligible for testing. As of July 2003, 26 patients had been enrolled in the service. A type I penicillin reaction was ruled out by the drug allergy history for 3 patients. The results were negative in 22 of the 23 patients who received skin testing, and in 1 the result was indeterminate. A penicillin or a beta-lactam antibiotic was administered to all 26 patients. No patient had a significant adverse reaction to skin testing or drug administration. CONCLUSION: A pharmacist-managed penicillinallergy skin-testing service was well received by physicians and showed potential to avoid unnecessary use of alternative antibiotics.
Authors: Zachary M Helmen; Melissa C Helm; Joseph H Helm; Alexander Nielsen; Tammy Kindel; Rana Higgins; Jon C Gould Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Anca M Chiriac; Aleena Banerji; Rebecca S Gruchalla; Bernard Y H Thong; Paige Wickner; Paul-Michel Mertes; Ingrid Terreehorst; Kimberly G Blumenthal Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract Date: 2018-12-17
Authors: Jason A Trubiano; Cosby A Stone; M Lindsay Grayson; Karen Urbancic; Monica A Slavin; Karin A Thursky; Elizabeth J Phillips Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract Date: 2017-08-23
Authors: Kimberly G Blumenthal; Erica S Shenoy; Anna R Wolfson; David N Berkowitz; Victoria A Carballo; Diana S Balekian; Kathleen A Marquis; Ramy Elshaboury; Ronak G Gandhi; Praveen Meka; David W Kubiak; Jennifer Catella; Barbara B Lambl; Joyce T Hsu; Monique M Freeley; Alana Gruszecki; Paige G Wickner Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract Date: 2017 May - Jun
Authors: Mary L Staicu; David Vyles; Erica S Shenoy; Cosby A Stone; Taylor Banks; Kristin S Alvarez; Kimberly G Blumenthal Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract Date: 2020-10