OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the sensitivity of an AIDS case-finding algorithm. METHOD: This study applied the AIDS case-finding algorithm to paid Medicaid claims linked to New Jersey AIDS surveillance data and assesses its sensitivity across subgroups of patients. FINDINGS: Of the 7183 cases with confirmed AIDS, based on the state's registry information, 95% (n = 6818) were correctly detected using all Medicaid claims, including pharmacy. For patients in a community-based waiver program, covered by Medicare, diagnosed with a severe mental illness, or continuously enrolled in Medicaid, with regular contact with the medical system, the algorithm identified almost all patients. To further evaluate algorithm performance, it was used with 2 groups of interest to researchers. For AIDS patients in the last 6 months of life, 88% were correctly detected without use of pharmacy claims and 95% when pharmacy claims were included. For pregnant women, data from the 6 months before the latest delivery date identify 27% of pregnant women without pharmacy claims and 41% when pharmacy claims were included. Using claims made after the latest delivery date, 81% of pregnant women were detected without pharmacy claims and 93% when pharmacy claims were included CONCLUSION: Results demonstrate that a multilevel screen can be used with Medicaid claims to effectively to detect most patients with AIDS. Detection is lower for some subgroups, and the absence of pharmacy claims can compromise detection.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the sensitivity of an AIDS case-finding algorithm. METHOD: This study applied the AIDS case-finding algorithm to paid Medicaid claims linked to New Jersey AIDS surveillance data and assesses its sensitivity across subgroups of patients. FINDINGS: Of the 7183 cases with confirmed AIDS, based on the state's registry information, 95% (n = 6818) were correctly detected using all Medicaid claims, including pharmacy. For patients in a community-based waiver program, covered by Medicare, diagnosed with a severe mental illness, or continuously enrolled in Medicaid, with regular contact with the medical system, the algorithm identified almost all patients. To further evaluate algorithm performance, it was used with 2 groups of interest to researchers. For AIDSpatients in the last 6 months of life, 88% were correctly detected without use of pharmacy claims and 95% when pharmacy claims were included. For pregnant women, data from the 6 months before the latest delivery date identify 27% of pregnant women without pharmacy claims and 41% when pharmacy claims were included. Using claims made after the latest delivery date, 81% of pregnant women were detected without pharmacy claims and 93% when pharmacy claims were included CONCLUSION: Results demonstrate that a multilevel screen can be used with Medicaid claims to effectively to detect most patients with AIDS. Detection is lower for some subgroups, and the absence of pharmacy claims can compromise detection.
Authors: James Walkup; Ayse Akincigil; Donald R Hoover; Michele J Siegel; Shahla Amin; Stephen Crystal Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2011 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Hillary Hernandez-Trujillo; Jordan S Orange; Jason A Roy; Yanli Wang; Craig N Newcomb; Qing Liu; Sean Hennessy; Vincent Lo Re Journal: J Clin Immunol Date: 2015-08-14 Impact factor: 8.317
Authors: Sally G Haskell; Kristin Mattocks; Joseph L Goulet; Erin E Krebs; Melissa Skanderson; Douglas Leslie; Amy C Justice; Elizabeth M Yano; Cynthia Brandt Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2011 Jan-Feb
Authors: Matthew M Burg; Cynthia Brandt; Eugenia Buta; Joseph Schwartz; Harini Bathulapalli; James Dziura; Donald E Edmondson; Sally Haskell Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2017 Feb/Mar Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Aaron F Alexander-Bloch; Armin Raznahan; Russell T Shinohara; Samuel R Mathias; Harini Bathulapalli; Ish P Bhalla; Joseph L Goulet; Theodore D Satterthwaite; Danielle S Bassett; David C Glahn; Cynthia A Brandt Journal: Proc Math Phys Eng Sci Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 2.704
Authors: W D King; P Minor; C Ramirez Kitchen; L E Oré; S Shoptaw; G D Victorianne; G Rust Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 3.710