Literature DB >> 15258431

Living will, resuscitation preferences, and attitudes towards life in an aged population.

Marja-Liisa Laakkonen1, Kaisu H Pitkala, Timo E Strandberg, Saila Berglind, Reijo S Tilvis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The growth of life-sustaining medical technology and greater attention to medical care at the end of life have provoked interest in issues related to advance care planning.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate how having a living will (LW), resuscitation preferences, health condition, and life attitudes are related in home-dwelling elderly people.
METHODS: In a cross-sectional descriptive study, detailed assessments were made of 378 home-dwelling elderly individuals participating in a cardiovascular prevention study (DEBATE Study). The participants were inquired about a preexistence of a written document (LW) concerning life-sustaining care, preferences of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in their current situation, and attitudes towards life. General health, physical and cognitive functioning, the presence of depression, and quality of life were also assessed.
RESULTS: Forty-four of the 378 participants (12%) had a LW. As compared with those without one (n = 334), there were more women [82% (36/44) vs. 63% (210/334)] and widows [57% (25/44) vs. 41% (135/334)] among those with a LW. They were also more educated and considered their health to be better. Despite having a LW, 46% (20/44) of them preferred CPR in their current condition, a proportion not statistically different from the 58% (194/334) of the individuals without a LW. In the whole sample, 39% (149/378) of the individuals preferred to forgo CPR. As compared with those preferring CPR, they were older, more often women, and widowed. Participants preferring to forgo CPR had a poorer quality of life, were more lonely, and showed signs of depression more often than those preferring CPR. The preference to forgo CPR was related to attitudes towards life regardless of physical or cognitive functioning.
CONCLUSIONS: Having a LW does not reduce the reported preference of CPR which is related more to current mental status and life attitudes. In-depth assessment of the patient's preferences should be performed in any comprehensive care plan. Copyright 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15258431     DOI: 10.1159/000078354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gerontology        ISSN: 0304-324X            Impact factor:   5.140


  8 in total

Review 1.  Ethical challenges with welfare technology: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Factors influencing ICU referral at the end of life in the elderly.

Authors:  R D Piers; D D Benoit; W J Schrauwen; N J Van Den Noortgate
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 1.281

3.  An audit of "do not attempt resuscitation" decisions in two district general hospitals: do current guidelines need changing?

Authors:  Dylan Harris; Rachel Davies
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Content of advance directives for individuals with advanced dementia.

Authors:  Patrick Triplett; Betty S Black; Hilary Phillips; Sarah Richardson Fahrendorf; Jack Schwartz; Andrew F Angelino; Danielle Anderson; Peter V Rabins
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  2008-08

Review 5.  The value of an ethics history?

Authors:  Abhay K Das; Graham P Mulley
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 18.000

6.  Changes in attitudes towards hastened death among Finnish physicians over the past sixteen years.

Authors:  Reetta P Piili; Riina Metsänoja; Heikki Hinkka; Pirkko-Liisa I Kellokumpu-Lehtinen; Juho T Lehto
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  Advance directives in European long-term care facilities: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Paula Andreasen; Ulla Harriet Finne-Soveri; Luc Deliens; Lieve Van den Block; Sheila Payne; Giovanni Gambassi; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen; Tinne Smets; Eero Lilja; Violetta Kijowska; Katarzyna Szczerbińska
Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 4.633

8.  Protocol for a national prevalence study of advance care planning documentation and self-reported uptake in Australia.

Authors:  Rasa Ruseckaite; Karen M Detering; Sue M Evans; Veronica Perera; Lynne Walker; Craig Sinclair; Josephine M Clayton; Linda Nolte
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.