Literature DB >> 15258098

Competency assessment in the clinical microbiology laboratory.

Susan E Sharp1, B Laurel Elder.   

Abstract

The laboratory comprises an invaluable part of the total health care provided to patients. Competency assessment is one method by which we can verify that our employees are competent to perform laboratory testing and report accurate and timely results. To derive the greatest benefit from the inclusion of competency assessment in the laboratory, we must be sure that we are addressing areas where our efforts can be best utilized to optimize patient care. To be competent, an employee must know how to perform a test, must have the ability to perform the test, must be able to perform the test properly without supervision, and know when there is a problem with the test that must be solved. In some cases, competency assessment protocols may demonstrate areas of competence but can fail to disclose incompetence. For example, challenges of low-complexity tasks (such as reading the technical procedure manual) are inferior to challenges that measure understanding and execution of a protocol, and poorly designed competency challenges will probably not detect substandard laboratory performance. Thus, if we are to receive the greatest benefit from our competency assessment programs, which may be time-consuming for the supervisors and the staff as well, we must not only meet the letter of the law but also find a way to make these assessments meaningful, instructive, and able to detect areas of concern. As we address competency assessment in our laboratories, we must understand that when done properly, competency assessment will reward our organizations and assist us in providing the best possible care to our patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15258098      PMCID: PMC452557          DOI: 10.1128/CMR.17.3.681-694.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev        ISSN: 0893-8512            Impact factor:   26.132


  10 in total

Review 1.  Competency assessment: establishing a program.

Authors:  A Tiehen
Journal:  Clin Lab Manage Rev       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct

2.  A brief history of medical diagnosis and the birth of the clinical laboratory. Part 3--Medicare, government regulation, and competency certification.

Authors:  D Berger
Journal:  MLO Med Lab Obs       Date:  1999-10

3.  Competency assessment in a team-based laboratory.

Authors:  S Gerbasi
Journal:  MLO Med Lab Obs       Date:  2000-09

4.  Medicare, Medicaid and CLIA programs; regulations implementing the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA)--HCFA. Final rule with comment period.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  1992-02-28

5.  Competency assessment--an exploratory study.

Authors:  L E Christian; K M Peddecord; D P Francis; J M Krolak
Journal:  Clin Lab Manage Rev       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec

6.  Performing poorly but testing perfectly.

Authors:  Daniel E Haun; Argie Leach
Journal:  Clin Leadersh Manag Rev       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr

7.  The Pap smear: a victim of its own success?

Authors:  Carmen K Steigman; John P Vernick
Journal:  MLO Med Lab Obs       Date:  2002-08

8.  Staff training and competency assessment the right way.

Authors:  K A George
Journal:  MLO Med Lab Obs       Date:  1996-12

Review 9.  "Litigation cells" in the Papanicolaou smear: extramural review of smears by "experts".

Authors:  W J Frable
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 10.  Papanicolaou smear 5-year retrospective review: what is required by the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988?

Authors:  D D Davey
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 5.534

  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  Biographical Feature: Susan E. Sharp, Ph.D., D(ABMM), F(AAM).

Authors:  Erik Munson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 11.677

2.  Competency assessment of microbiology medical laboratory technologists in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Marc Desjardins; Christine Ann Fleming
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Clinical Laboratory Biosafety Gaps: Lessons Learned from Past Outbreaks Reveal a Path to a Safer Future.

Authors:  Nancy E Cornish; Nancy L Anderson; Diego G Arambula; Matthew J Arduino; Andrew Bryan; Nancy C Burton; Bin Chen; Beverly A Dickson; Judith G Giri; Natasha K Griffith; Michael A Pentella; Reynolds M Salerno; Paramjit Sandhu; James W Snyder; Christopher A Tormey; Elizabeth A Wagar; Elizabeth G Weirich; Sheldon Campbell
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 50.129

4.  Internal quality assurance in diagnostic microbiology: A simple approach for insightful data.

Authors:  Valentin Scherz; Christian Durussel; Gilbert Greub
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Factors affecting tuberculosis case detection in Kersa District, South West Ethiopia.

Authors:  Desalegn Dabaro
Journal:  J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis       Date:  2017-08-12

6.  Performance evaluation of malaria microscopists working at rechecking laboratories in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Abnet Abebe; Meseret Belayneh; Habtamu Asrat; Wondwossen Kassa; Andargachew Gashu; Adino Desale; Getnet Hailu; Tesfaye Mekonnen; Feven Girmachew; Achamyeleh Mulugeta; Ebise Abose; Dereje Yenealem; Abeba G Tsadik; Adisu Kebede; Gonfa Ayana; Kassu Desta
Journal:  Malariaworld J       Date:  2017-06-01

7.  The need to improve antimicrobial susceptibility testing capacity in Ugandan health facilities: insights from a surveillance primer.

Authors:  Duku Chaplain; Butti Ben Asutaku; Muhammad Mona; Douglas Bulafu; Dickson Aruhomukama
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 4.887

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.