Literature DB >> 15257854

Evaluation of public health demonstration programs: the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of WISEWOMAN.

Eric A Finkelstein1, John S Wittenborn, Rosanne P Farris.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In today's healthcare environment, public health resources are scarce. Thus, interventions to improve the public's health must be rigorously evaluated to ensure that they make the best use of available resources.
METHODS: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) provides a general framework for program evaluation. This paper presents additional details on several key evaluation areas within CDC's framework.
RESULTS: Successful evaluations will be built into the program design; will be multifaceted, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative methods; will assess both process and outcome measures; and will engage stakeholders to ensure utility of results.
CONCLUSIONS: Well-planned evaluations can lead to less burdensome yet more effective assessment and better program performance and can increase the knowledge base for health promotion practice.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15257854     DOI: 10.1089/1540999041281043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  4 in total

1.  Economics of public health programs for underserved populations: a review of economic analysis of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.

Authors:  Jaya S Khushalani; Justin G Trogdon; Donatus U Ekwueme; K Robin Yabroff
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Optimizing linkage and retention to hypertension care in rural Kenya (LARK hypertension study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Rajesh Vedanthan; Jemima H Kamano; Violet Naanyu; Allison K Delong; Martin C Were; Eric A Finkelstein; Diana Menya; Constantine O Akwanalo; Gerald S Bloomfield; Cynthia A Binanay; Eric J Velazquez; Joseph W Hogan; Carol R Horowitz; Thomas S Inui; Sylvester Kimaiyo; Valentin Fuster
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  Improving eye care in residential aged care facilities using the Residential Ocular Care (ROC) model: study protocol for a multicentered, prospective, customized, and cluster randomized controlled trial in Australia.

Authors:  Edith E Holloway; Marios Constantinou; Jing Xie; Eva K Fenwick; Eric A Finkelstein; Ryan E K Man; Michael Coote; Jonathan Jackson; Gwyn Rees; Ecosse L Lamoureux
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Cost-effectiveness of health risk reduction after lifestyle education in the small workplace.

Authors:  Jorie C Allen; James B Lewis; Anthony R Tagliaferro
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 2.830

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.