Literature DB >> 15257650

Determinants of GP billing in Australia: content and time.

Helena Britt1, Lisa Valenti, Graeme C Miller, Jillann Farmer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine relations between consultation length and content, and general practitioner choice of claiming level B or C when billing consultations > 20 minutes through Medicare. DESIGN AND
SETTING: A secondary analysis from a cross-sectional national general practice survey (1 April 2000 to 31 March 2003) of 101 112 consultations with 2811 GPs, comparing level B consultations <or= 20 minutes with consultations > 20 minutes (claimed as level B or C), and consultations > 20 minutes claimed as level C with those claimed as level B. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Consultation length, encounter, patient characteristics; number, type of problems managed; type and frequency of treatments provided in relation to consultation level charged.
RESULTS: There were 80 476 level B consultations <or= 20 minutes and 14 893 > 20 minutes claimed as level B or C (5725 [38.4%] level B; 9168 [61.5%] level C). Longer level B+C consultations differed from shorter level B consultations in patient sex, Department of Veterans' Affairs card status, and new-patient status, and involved more reasons for encounter, problems managed, chronic problems, clinical treatments, therapeutic procedures, referrals and pathology and imaging orders. Longer consultations claimed as level C were significantly longer (0.9 minutes) than those claimed as level B and involved more reasons for encounter, problems managed (particularly new, chronic, psychosocial and gynaecological) and more clinical treatments.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient characteristics and consultation content differ at longer consultations. Consultations charged as level C are more complex than those charged as level B. GPs use both time and content when choosing item number, rather than relying only on specified time thresholds. This has implications for future restructuring of MBS attendance items.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15257650

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  4 in total

1.  A few more minutes make a difference? The relationship between content and length of GP consultations.

Authors:  Tore Gude; Per Vaglum; Tor Anvik; Anders Bærheim; Hilde Grimstad
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 2.581

2.  Does government subsidy for costs of medical and pharmaceutical services result in higher service utilization by older widowed women in Australia?

Authors:  Leigh R Tooth; Richard Hockey; Susan Treloar; Christine McClintock; Annette Dobson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 3.  Do longer consultations improve the management of psychological problems in general practice? A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Catherine Hutton; Jane Gunn
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Improving the planning of the GP workforce in Australia: a simulation model incorporating work transitions, health need and service usage.

Authors:  Caroline O Laurence; Jonathan Karnon
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2016-04-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.