Literature DB >> 15256910

Enrichment of non-apoptotic human spermatozoa after cryopreservation by immunomagnetic cell sorting.

S Grunewald1, U Paasch, H J Glander.   

Abstract

Cryopreservation increases the rate of apoptotic spermatozoa with decreased capability to fertilise oocytes. In order to optimise the fertilisation rates, especially in assisted reproduction the use of apoptotic sperms should be avoided. Early events of apoptosis in cryopreserved spermatozoa are not detectable by conventional methods. However, the surface of apoptotic spermatozoa is characterised by externalisation of phosphatidylserine (PS), which has a high affinity to Annexin V. Therefore, colloid paramagnetic Annexin-V-conjugated microbeads (AN-MB) were tested for their ability to eliminate apoptotic spermatozoa from a total of 40 fresh and in TEST yolk buffer cryopreserved semen samples which were provided by 15 healthy volunteers. By passing through a magnetic field (MiniMACS, Miltenyi Biotec) the sperm suspensions were divided into 2 sperm fractions depending on bound magnetic Annexin V-microbeads (AN-MB) to spermatozoa. As additional markers of apoptosis CD95 (Fas, APO-1) on the sperm surface and activated caspases in the cytosol were detected in both fractions. Supplementary investigations comprised eosin-supravital staining and computer assisted sperm motion analysis. The separation was supervised by flow cytometric analysis of spermatozoa labelled with FITC-conjugated anti Annexin V-antibodies. Analyses of the magnetic inactive sperm fraction (AN-MB-negative) showed CD95 on 0.6 +/- 0.3% (X +/- SEM) of spermatozoa and only 3.2 +/- 0.5% were stainable with eosin, whereas, 40.6 +/- 6.7% of the remaining cells in the column appeared to be CD95 positive and 99.8 +/- 0.1% stainable with eosin after cryopreservation. Indeed the overall amount of CD95 positive spermatozoa did not significantly increase after cryopreservation (2.5 +/- 0.5% vs. 4.3 +/- 1.2%; p > 0.05). Activated caspases were found in 21.8 +/- 2.6% of the spermatozoa in fresh and in 47.7 +/- 5.8% of cryopreserved semen samples (p < 0.01). The separation procedure of the cryopreserved spermatozoa reduced significantly the quantity of those containing activated caspases to 9.3 +/- 2.2% within the AN-MB-negative fraction. In contrast 89.1 +/- 2.3% of AN-MB-positive sperms showed activation of these proteolytic enzymes. Flow cytometric analyses using FITC-conjugated anti Annexin V-antibodies for monitoring of AN-MB-binding to spermatozoa showed 5.2 +/- 1.0% labelled spermatozoa in the AN-MB negative fraction and 72.6 +/- 2.7% labelled spermatozoa in the AN-MB positive one. There was no significant influence of the separation column and the magnetic field on the sperm functions. The passage through the column led to a sperm loss of 0.8 +/- 1.2%.
Conclusion: The binding of paramagnetic Annexin V-conjugated microbeads is an excellent method to eliminate spermatozoa at early apoptotic stages from cryopreserved semen samples. A deleterious influence of the separation column and the magnetic field on the spermatozoa was not observed.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 15256910     DOI: 10.1023/A:1020188913551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank        ISSN: 1389-9333            Impact factor:   1.522


  19 in total

Review 1.  Advanced sperm selection techniques for assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Sam Lepine; Simon McDowell; Leigh M Searle; Ben Kroon; Demián Glujovsky; Anusch Yazdani
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-07-30

2.  Clinical outcome of magnetic activated cell sorting of non-apoptotic spermatozoa before density gradient centrifugation for assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Enver Kerem Dirican; Osman Denizhan Ozgün; Süleyman Akarsu; Kadir Okhan Akin; Ozge Ercan; Mukaddes Uğurlu; Cağri Camsari; Oya Kanyilmaz; Adnan Kaya; Ali Unsal
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Lower sperm DNA fragmentation after r-FSH administration in functional hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.

Authors:  Giovanni Ruvolo; Maria Carmela Roccheri; Anna Maria Brucculeri; Salvatore Longobardi; Ettore Cittadini; Liana Bosco
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-02-24       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Sperm selection using magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) in assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Monica Gil; Valerie Sar-Shalom; Yolisid Melendez Sivira; Ramon Carreras; Miguel Angel Checa
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Evaluation of Fas positive sperm and complement mediated lysis in subfertile individuals.

Authors:  Maryam Soleimani; Marziyeh Tavalaee; Roshanak Aboutorabi; Minoo Adib; Hamid Bahramian; Ehsan Janzamin; Abbas Kiani; Mohammad Hossein Nasr-Esfahani
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  Sperm preparation: state-of-the-art--physiological aspects and application of advanced sperm preparation methods.

Authors:  Ralf Henkel
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 3.285

7.  Mitochondrial staining allows robust elimination of apoptotic and damaged cells during cell sorting.

Authors:  Natasha S Barteneva; Eugeny D Ponomarev; Alla Tsytsykova; Myriam Armant; Ivan A Vorobjev
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 2.479

8.  Annexin V magnetic-activated cell sorting versus swim-up for the selection of human sperm in ART: is the new approach better then the traditional one?

Authors:  Marco Nadalini; Nicoletta Tarozzi; Marlea Di Santo; Andrea Borini
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 9.  Utility of magnetic cell separation as a molecular sperm preparation technique.

Authors:  Tamer M Said; Ashok Agarwal; Maciej Zborowski; Sonja Grunewald; Hans-Juergen Glander; Uwe Paasch
Journal:  J Androl       Date:  2007-12-12

Review 10.  Male Factors: the Role of Sperm in Preimplantation Embryo Quality.

Authors:  Zahra Bashiri; Fardin Amidi; Iraj Amiri; Zahra Zandieh; Chad B Maki; Fatemeh Mohammadi; Sadegh Amiri; Morteza Koruji
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 3.060

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.