Literature DB >> 15256633

From the RSNA refresher courses: imaging evaluation for acute pain in the right upper quadrant.

Anthony E Hanbidge1, Philip M Buckler, Martin E O'Malley, Stephanie R Wilson.   

Abstract

Acute cholecystitis is the most common cause of acute pain in the right upper quadrant (RUQ), and urgent surgical removal of the gallbladder is the treatment of choice for uncomplicated disease. However, cross-sectional imaging is essential because more than one-third of patients with acute RUQ pain do not have acute cholecystitis. In addition, patients with complications of acute cholecystitis, such as perforation, are often best treated with supportive measures initially and elective cholecystectomy at a later date. Ultrasound (US) is the primary imaging modality for assessment of acute RUQ pain; US is both sensitive and specific in demonstrating gallstones, biliary dilatation, and features that suggest acute inflammatory disease. Occasionally, additional imaging modalities are indicated. Computed tomography is valuable, especially for confirming the extent and nature of the complications of acute cholecystitis. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography is helpful in complicated ductal disease (eg, recurrent pyogenic cholangiohepatitis) when more detailed diagnostic information is required for treatment planning, whereas endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is used when biliary intervention is required (eg, treatment of choledocholithiasis). Successful imaging with all modalities requires familiarity with both the characteristic and the unusual features of a wide variety of pathologic conditions. In addition, potential pitfalls must be recognized and avoided. Copyright RSNA, 2004

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15256633     DOI: 10.1148/rg.244035149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  8 in total

1.  Comparing the Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound and CT in Evaluating Acute Cholecystitis.

Authors:  Joss R Wertz; Juliet M Lopez; David Olson; William M Thompson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Scrub typhus: radiological and clinical findings in abdominopelvic involvement.

Authors:  Kun Yung Kim; Ji Soo Song; Eun Hae Park; Gong Yong Jin
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Incarcerated Morgagni hernia mimicking acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Jeffrey Forris Beecham Chick; Nikunj Rashmikant Chauhan; Jennifer H Lai; Bharti Khurana
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 4.  The role of emergency ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute non-traumatic epigastric pain.

Authors:  Americo Testa; Ernesto Cristiano Lauritano; Rosangela Giannuzzi; Giulia Pignataro; Ivo Casagranda; Nicolò Gentiloni Silveri
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 3.397

5.  ACR appropriateness criteria right upper quadrant pain.

Authors:  Gail M Yarmish; Martin P Smith; Max P Rosen; Mark E Baker; Michael A Blake; Brooks D Cash; Nicole M Hindman; Ihab R Kamel; Harmeet Kaur; Rendon C Nelson; Robert J Piorkowski; Aliya Qayyum; Mark Tulchinsky
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 6.  What's new in the hot gallbladder: the evolving radiologic diagnosis and management of acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  James P Nugent; Jessica Li; Emily Pang; Alison Harris
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-03-01

7.  Emphysematous pancreatitis associated with penetrating duodenal ulcer.

Authors:  Claudio Tana; Mauro Silingardi; Maria Adele Giamberardino; Francesco Cipollone; Tiziana Meschi; Cosima Schiavone
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Differentiation of acute cholecystitis from chronic cholecystitis: Determination of useful multidetector computed tomography findings.

Authors:  Dong Myung Yeo; Seung Eun Jung
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.889

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.