Literature DB >> 15255391

AICRG, Part III: The influence of antibiotic use on the survival of a new implant design.

Harold F Morris1, Shigeru Ochi, Richard Plezia, Harry Gilbert, C Daniel Dent, James Pikulski, Paul M Lambert.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The American College of Surgeons guidelines suggest that complex oral surgery may benefit from prophylactic antibiotic coverage. The use of preoperative antibiotics, postoperative antibiotics, or both during implant placement is a widely accepted practice in the United States, whereas dentists in other countries rarely use antibiotics.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine if antibiotic coverage at the time of implant placement improves the survival of the Ankylos implant.
METHODS: As part of a comprehensive, multicentered, multidisciplinary, prospective, independent, international clinical study, designed and coordinated in the United States by the Ankylos Implant Clinical Research Group (AICRG), the use of preoperative (several regimens) and postoperative antibiotics (yes/no) were carefully documented to assess their influence on improving survival. A total of 1500 Ankylos implants were placed and followed for a period of 3 to 5 years. The decision to use antibiotics and the regimen to be employed was made by the treating surgeon. Failure was defined as removal of the implant for any reason. All data were entered into a computerized database for analysis.
RESULTS: The use of preoperative antibiotics produced no significant improvement (P = .21, Fisher's exact test) in survival compared with those placed without antibiotic coverage. There was no significant difference between the regimens defined as AHA-1990, AHA-1997, and Peterson's recommendations.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that there was little or no advantage to providing antibiotic coverage when placing this implant. These findings also suggest that the use of antibiotics for implant placement may not be as beneficial as once believed. If validated by other studies, the elimination of this practice for routine implant placement would represent a small but significant step forward in the reduction of unnecessary antibiotic use.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15255391     DOI: 10.1563/1548-1336(2004)30<144:APITIO>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 0160-6972            Impact factor:   1.779


  6 in total

1.  Early wound healing following one-stage dental implant placement with and without antibiotic prophylaxis: a pilot study.

Authors:  Samer B Khoury; Leslie Thomas; John D Walters; John F Sheridan; Binnaz Leblebicioglu
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 6.993

2.  Antibiotics prescribing practices in oral implantology among jordanian dentists. A cross sectional, observational study.

Authors:  Ashraf E Abukaraky; Khaldoon Abu Afifeh; Adel A Khatib; Nadiajda O Khdairi; Hanan M Habarneh; Waleed Kh Ahmad; Ahmad As Hamdan; Faleh A Sawair
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2011-07-28

3.  Effects of antibiotics on dental implants: a review.

Authors:  Nabeel Ahmad; Najeeb Saad
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2012-01-17

4.  Effect of Postoperative Amoxicillin on Early Bacterial Colonization of Peri-Implant Sulcus: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Neda Moslemi; Aysan Shahnaz; Abbas Bahador; Sepehr Torabi; Sanaa Jabbari; Zahra Alizadeh Oskouei
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2016-09

5.  The Risk Factors in Early Failure of Dental Implants: a Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Hassan Mohajerani; Roozbeh Roozbayani; Shahram Taherian; Reza Tabrizi
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2017-12

6.  Antibiotic prophylaxis for implant placement: a systematic review of effects on reduction of implant failure.

Authors:  Andy Seongju Kim; Nancy Abdelhay; Liran Levin; John D Walters; Monica P Gibson
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.727

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.