Literature DB >> 15255390

AICRG, Part II: Crestal bone loss associated with the Ankylos implant: loading to 36 months.

Cherng-Tzeh Chou1, Harold F Morris, Shigeru Ochi, Lori Walker, Deborah DesRosiers.   

Abstract

PROBLEM: The Ankylos endosseous dental implant is a new implant design that will be available in the United States in early 2004. It features an internal tapered abutment connection, a smooth polished collar without threads at the coronal part of the implant body, and a roughened surface with variable threads on the body of the implant fixture. A precise, tapered, conical abutment connection eliminates the microgap often found in 2-stage implant systems. This microgap may allow the accumulation of food debris and bacteria, as well as micromovement between the parts during clinical function, both of which can lead to a localized inflammation and crestal bone loss.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this section of the study was to assess any crestal bone loss associated with this new implant.
METHOD: The clinical performance of this new implant design was studied under well-controlled clinical conditions. Over 1500 implants were placed and restored. The vertical crestal bone loss was measured "directly" between the time of implant placement and uncovering, using a periodontal probe. Serial dental radiographs were taken between loading, and the 12-, 24-, and 36-month follow-up visits to determine "indirect" crestal bone loss within a specific period.
RESULTS: Bone loss varied among the participating centers from less than 0.5 mm to 2.0 mm. The largest amount of bone loss occurred between the time of placement and uncovering. Following loading, the mean bone loss for all implants for a period of 3 years was about 0.2 mm/y.
CONCLUSIONS: The extent of the crestal bone loss after loading was minimal for patients regardless of age, gender, prosthetic applications, bone density, and remote or crestal incisions, as well as for smokers or nonsmokers. Bone loss per year is well within the guidelines of 0.2 mm/y proposed by others.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15255390     DOI: 10.1563/1548-1336(2004)30<134:APICBL>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 0160-6972            Impact factor:   1.779


  9 in total

Review 1.  Is the internal connection more efficient than external connection in mechanical, biological, and esthetical point of views? A systematic review.

Authors:  Marcelo Coelho Goiato; Eduardo Piza Pellizzer; Emily Vivianne Freitas da Silva; Liliane da Rocha Bonatto; Daniela Micheline dos Santos
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-04-25

2.  Retrospective Clinical Study of Marginal Bone Level Changes with Two Different Screw-Implant Types: Comparison Between Tissue Level (TE) and Bone Level (BL) Implant.

Authors:  Vinay V Kumar; Keyvan Sagheb; Peer W Kämmerer; Bilal Al-Nawas; Wilfried Wagner
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-06-11

3.  Biomechanical effects of platform switching in two different implant systems: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  Mahasti Sahabi; Mehdi Adibrad; Fatemeh Sadat Mirhashemi; Sareh Habibzadeh
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2013-05-31

4.  Case presentation of two patients using diagonal platform-switched double implants for maxillary single-first-molar replacement as the alternative of a single-tooth implant.

Authors:  Yasunori Hotta; Koji Ito; Shinichi Komatsu; Takashi Saito
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2015-11-12

Review 5.  Morse taper dental implants and platform switching: The new paradigm in oral implantology.

Authors:  José Paulo Macedo; Jorge Pereira; Brendan R Vahey; Bruno Henriques; Cesar A M Benfatti; Ricardo S Magini; José López-López; Júlio C M Souza
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

6.  Hard and soft-tissue evaluation of bar-clip, ball-socket, and kerator attachments in mandibular implant overdenture treatment: An in vivo study.

Authors:  Nitish Varshney; Sakshi Gupta; Sumit Aggarwal; Shalabh Kumar; M Sadish; Mohsin Khan
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2019-10-10

7.  Effect of platform switching on the peri-implant bone: A finite element study.

Authors:  Kheira Bouazza-Juanes; Amparo Martínez-González; Germán Peiró; Juan-José Ródenas; María-Victoria López-Mollá
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2015-10-01

8.  A staged approach of implant placement in immediate extraction sockets for preservation of peri-implant soft and hard tissue.

Authors:  Dileep Nag Vinnakota; Sreenivasa Rao Akula; V Vamsi Krishna Reddy; V Vijay Sankar
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2014-03

9.  Evaluation of hard and soft tissue changes around implant in partially edentulous patients: a clinico-radiographic study.

Authors:  Nidhi Mehrotra; Amrinder Singh Tuli; Megha Phogat Rana; Rohit Singh; Avnish Singh; Vivek Singh
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2021-04-19
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.