Literature DB >> 15255103

The mode of pheromone evolution: evidence from bark beetles.

Matthew R E Symonds1, Mark A Elgar.   

Abstract

Sex and aggregation pheromones consist of species-specific blends of chemicals. The way in which different species' blends have evolved has been the subject of some debate. Theoretical predictions suggest that differences between species have arisen not through the accruing of small changes, but through major shifts in chemical composition. Using data on the aggregation pheromones of 34 species of bark beetle from two genera, Dendroctonus and Ips, we investigated how the distributions of the chemical components of their pheromone blends mirror their phylogenetic relationships. We tested whether there were consistent patterns that could be used to help elucidate the mode of pheromone evolution. Although there were obvious differences in pheromone blends between the two genera, the differences between species within each genus followed a less clear phylogenetic pattern. In both genera, closely related species are just as different as more distantly related species. Within Dendroctonus, particularly, most chemical components were distributed randomly across the phylogeny. Indeed, for some chemicals, closely related species may actually be more different than would be expected from a random distribution of chemical components. This argues strongly against the idea of minor shifts in pheromone evolution. Instead, we suggest that, within certain phylogenetic constraints, pheromone evolution in bark beetles is characterized by large saltational shifts, resulting in sibling species being substantially phenotypically (i.e. pheromonally) different from one another, thus agreeing with theoretical predictions.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15255103      PMCID: PMC1691658          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  4 in total

Review 1.  Mating behavior and chemical communication in the order Hymenoptera.

Authors:  M Ayasse; R J Paxton; J Tengö
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 19.686

2.  Phylogeny affects estimation of metabolic scaling in mammals.

Authors:  Matthew R E Symonds; Mark A Elgar
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Phylogeny of ips DeGeer species (Coleoptera: scolytidae) inferred from mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I DNA sequence.

Authors:  A I Cognato; F A Sperling
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.286

4.  Selective production of cis- and trans-verbenol from (-)-and (+)-alpha by a bark beetle.

Authors:  J A Renwick; P R Hughes; I S Krull
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-01-16       Impact factor: 47.728

  4 in total
  30 in total

1.  Eulemur, me lemur: the evolution of scent-signal complexity in a primate clade.

Authors:  Javier delBarco-Trillo; Caitlin R Sacha; George R Dubay; Christine M Drea
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Host specific social parasites (Psithyrus) indicate chemical recognition system in bumblebees.

Authors:  Stephen J Martin; Jonathan M Carruthers; Paul H Williams; Falko P Drijfhout
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 3.  The origin and dynamic evolution of chemical information transfer.

Authors:  Sandra Steiger; Thomas Schmitt; H Martin Schaefer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Dissecting ant recognition systems in the age of genomics.

Authors:  Neil D Tsutsui
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Sex pheromone of a coccoid insect with sexual and asexual lineages: fate of an ancestrally essential sexual signal in parthenogenetic females.

Authors:  Jun Tabata; Ryoko T Ichiki; Chie Moromizato; Kenji Mori
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 6.  Carabidae Semiochemistry: Current and Future Directions.

Authors:  Adam M Rork; Tanya Renner
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Genetic control of the enantiomeric composition of ipsdienol in the pine engraver, Ips pini.

Authors:  Michael J Domingue; William T Starmer; Stephen A Teale
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-05-20       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Cuticular hydrocarbon divergence in the jewel wasp Nasonia: evolutionary shifts in chemical communication channels?

Authors:  J Buellesbach; J Gadau; L W Beukeboom; F Echinger; R Raychoudhury; J H Werren; T Schmitt
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 2.411

9.  Coevolution of exploiter specialization and victim mimicry can be cyclic and saltational.

Authors:  Niclas Norrström; Wayne M Getz; Noél M A Holmgren
Journal:  Evol Bioinform Online       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 1.625

10.  Evidence of repeated and independent saltational evolution in a peculiar genus of sphinx moths (Proserpinus: Sphingidae).

Authors:  Daniel Rubinoff; Johannes J Le Roux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.