Literature DB >> 15254647

Robot-assisted orthopedic surgery.

Anthony Adili1.   

Abstract

The main advantages of robot-assisted orthopedic surgery over conventional orthopedic techniques are improved accuracy and precision in the preparation of bone surfaces, more reliable and reproducible outcomes, and greater spatial accuracy. Orthopedic surgery is ideally suited for the application of robotic systems. The ability to isolate and rigidly fix bones in known positions allows robotic devices to be securely fixed to the bone. As such, the bone is treated as a fixed object, simplifying the computer control of the robotic system. Commercially available robotic systems can be categorized as either passive or active devices, or can be categorized as positioning or milling/cutting devices. Computer assisted orthopedic surgery is a related area of technological development in orthopedics; however, robot-assisted orthopedic surgery can achieve levels of accuracy, precision, and safety not capable with computer assisted orthopedic surgery. Applications of robot-assisted orthopedic surgery currently under investigation include total hip and knee replacement, tunnel placement for reconstruction of knee ligaments, and trauma and spinal procedures. Several short-term studies demonstrate the feasibility of robotic applications in orthopedics, however, there are no published long-term data defining the efficacy of robot-assisted orthopedic surgery. Issues of cost, training, and safety must be addressed before robot-assisted orthopedic surgery becomes widely available. Robot-assisted orthopedic surgery is still very much in its infancy but it has the potential to transform the way orthopedic procedures are done in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15254647     DOI: 10.1177/107155170401100205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Laparosc Surg        ISSN: 1071-5517


  4 in total

1.  Statistical atlas-based morphological variation analysis of the asian humerus: towards consistent allometric implant positioning.

Authors:  K Wu; K L Wong; S J K Ng; S T Quek; B Zhou; D P Murphy; Z J Daruwalla; H Ren
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  The Current Concepts of Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Joong-Myung Lee
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2016-12-28

3.  Robotics-assisted versus conventional manual approaches for total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Peng-Fei Han; Cheng-Long Chen; Zhi-Liang Zhang; Yi-Chen Han; Lei Wei; Peng-Cui Li; Xiao-Chun Wei
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 2.547

4.  Using the Starr Frame and Da Vinci surgery system for pelvic fracture and sacral nerve injury.

Authors:  Ye Peng; Wei Zhang; Gongzi Zhang; Xiang Wang; Shuwei Zhang; Xin Ma; Peifu Tang; Lihai Zhang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 2.359

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.