Literature DB >> 15254130

Preferential flow of bromide, bentazon, and imidacloprid in a Dutch clay soil.

Rômulo Penna Scorza Júnior1, Johan H Smelt, Jos J T I Boesten, Rob F A Hendriks, Sjoerd E A T M van der Zee.   

Abstract

Leaching to ground water and tile drains are important parts of the environmental assessment of pesticides. The aims of the present study were to (i) assess the significance of preferential flow for pesticide leaching under realistic worst-case conditions for Dutch agriculture (soil profile with thick clay layer and high rainfall) and (ii) collect a high-quality data set that is suitable for testing pesticide leaching models. The movement of water, bromide, and the pesticides bentazon [3-isopropyl-1H-2, 1,3-benzothiadiazine-4(3H)-one-2,2-dioxide] and imidacloprid [1-[(6-chloro-3-pyridinyl)-methyl]-N-nitro-2-imidazolidinimine] was monitored in a clay soil for about 1 yr. The 1.2-ha field was located in the central part of the Netherlands (51 degrees 53' N, 5 degrees 43' E). The soil was a Eutric Fluvisol cropped with winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Tile drains were present at a 0.8- to 0.9-m depth and the ground water level fluctuated between a 0.5- and 2-m depth. All chemicals were applied in spring. None of the soil concentration profiles showed bimodal concentration distributions. However, for each substance the highest concentration in drain water was found in the first drainage event after its application, which indicates preferential flow. This preferential flow is probably caused by permanent macropores that were present in the 0.3- to 1.0-m layer. At the time of the first drainage event, the drain water concentration of each substance was about an order of magnitude higher than its ground water concentration. Thus, the flux concentrations in drain water proved to be a more sensitive detector of preferential flow than the resident concentrations in the soil profile and the ground water.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15254130     DOI: 10.2134/jeq2004.1473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Qual        ISSN: 0047-2425            Impact factor:   2.751


  3 in total

Review 1.  Environmental fate and exposure; neonicotinoids and fipronil.

Authors:  J-M Bonmatin; C Giorio; V Girolami; D Goulson; D P Kreutzweiser; C Krupke; M Liess; E Long; M Marzaro; E A D Mitchell; D A Noome; N Simon-Delso; A Tapparo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Impacts of Neonicotinoids on Molluscs: What We Know and What We Need to Know.

Authors:  Endurance E Ewere; Amanda Reichelt-Brushett; Kirsten Benkendorff
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2021-01-22

3.  A holistic study of neonicotinoids neuroactive insecticides-properties, applications, occurrence, and analysis.

Authors:  Bogusław Buszewski; Małgorzata Bukowska; Magdalena Ligor; Irena Staneczko-Baranowska
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 4.223

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.