Noreen Maconochie1, Pat Doyle, Claire Carson. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University of London, London WC1E 7HT. noreen.maconochie@lshtm.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine the hypothesis that, theoretically at least, exposure to toxicants of the type present in the Gulf war could affect spermatogenesis, which might be observed as increased levels of infertility. DESIGN: Retrospective reproductive cohort analysis. SETTING: Male UK Gulf war veterans and matched comparison group of non-deployed servicemen, surveyed by postal questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS: 42,818 completed questionnaires were returned, representing response rates of 53% for Gulf veterans and 42% for non-Gulf veterans; 10,465 Gulf veterans and 7376 non-Gulf veterans reported fathering or trying to father pregnancies after the Gulf war. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Failure to achieve conceptions (type I infertility) or live births (type II infertility) after the Gulf war, having tried for at least a year and consulted a doctor; time to conception among pregnancies fathered by men not reporting fertility problems. RESULTS: Risk of reported infertility was higher among Gulf war veterans than among non-Gulf veterans (odds ratio for type I infertility 1.41, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.89; type II 1.50, 1.18 to 1.89). This small effect was constant over time since the war and was observed whether or not the men had fathered pregnancies before the war. Results were similar when analyses were restricted to clinically confirmed diagnoses. Pregnancies fathered by Gulf veterans not reporting fertility problems also took longer to conceive (odds ratio for > 1 year 1.18, 1.04 to 1.34). CONCLUSIONS: We found some evidence of an association between Gulf war service and reported infertility. Pregnancies fathered by Gulf veterans with no fertility problems also reportedly took longer to conceive.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the hypothesis that, theoretically at least, exposure to toxicants of the type present in the Gulf war could affect spermatogenesis, which might be observed as increased levels of infertility. DESIGN: Retrospective reproductive cohort analysis. SETTING: Male UK Gulf war veterans and matched comparison group of non-deployed servicemen, surveyed by postal questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS: 42,818 completed questionnaires were returned, representing response rates of 53% for Gulf veterans and 42% for non-Gulf veterans; 10,465 Gulf veterans and 7376 non-Gulf veterans reported fathering or trying to father pregnancies after the Gulf war. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Failure to achieve conceptions (type I infertility) or live births (type II infertility) after the Gulf war, having tried for at least a year and consulted a doctor; time to conception among pregnancies fathered by men not reporting fertility problems. RESULTS: Risk of reported infertility was higher among Gulf war veterans than among non-Gulf veterans (odds ratio for type I infertility 1.41, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.89; type II 1.50, 1.18 to 1.89). This small effect was constant over time since the war and was observed whether or not the men had fathered pregnancies before the war. Results were similar when analyses were restricted to clinically confirmed diagnoses. Pregnancies fathered by Gulf veterans not reporting fertility problems also took longer to conceive (odds ratio for > 1 year 1.18, 1.04 to 1.34). CONCLUSIONS: We found some evidence of an association between Gulf war service and reported infertility. Pregnancies fathered by Gulf veterans with no fertility problems also reportedly took longer to conceive.
Authors: M R Araneta; C A Moore; R S Olney; L D Edmonds; J A Karcher; C McDonough; K M Hiliopoulos; K M Schlangen; G C Gray Journal: Teratology Date: 1997-10
Authors: Pat Doyle; Noreen Maconochie; Graham Davies; Ian Maconochie; Margo Pelerin; Susan Prior; Samantha Lewis Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2004-03-24 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Maria Rosario G Araneta; Karen M Schlangen; Larry D Edmonds; Daniel A Destiche; Ruth D Merz; Charlotte A Hobbs; Timothy J Flood; John A Harris; Diane Krishnamurti; Gregory C Gray Journal: Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol Date: 2003-04
Authors: Noreen Maconochie; Pat Doyle; Graham Davies; Samantha Lewis; Margo Pelerin; Susan Prior; Patrick Sampson Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2003-01-10 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Timothy S Wells; Linda Z Wang; Christina N Spooner; Tyler C Smith; Katia M Hiliopoulos; Deborah R Kamens; Gregory C Gray; Paul A Sato Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2006-07-11
Authors: Amy R Johnson; Corneliu N Craciunescu; Zhong Guo; Ya-Wen Teng; Randy J Thresher; Jan K Blusztajn; Steven H Zeisel Journal: FASEB J Date: 2010-04-06 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Amanda J Adeleye; Tanya W Kristof; Aaditi G Naik; Sandra Madueke Laveaux; Jennifer Cone; Sarah Faris; Tanya L Zakrison Journal: F S Rep Date: 2021-12-01
Authors: Helen L Kelsall; Malcolm R Sim; Jillian F Ikin; Andrew B Forbes; Dean P McKenzie; Deborah C Glass; Peter Ittak Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2007-05-16 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Catherine Verret; Mathe-Aline Jutand; Catherine De Vigan; Marion Bégassat; Lynda Bensefa-Colas; Patrick Brochard; Roger Salamon Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2008-04-28 Impact factor: 3.295