Literature DB >> 15253643

Electrochemical detection of single-nucleotide mismatches: application of M-DNA.

Yi-Tao Long1, Chen-Zhong Li, Todd C Sutherland, Heinz-Bernhard Kraatz, Jeremy S Lee.   

Abstract

The detection of a single-nucleotide mismatch in unlabeled duplex DNA by electrochemical methods is presented. Impedance spectroscopy is used to characterize a perfect duplex monolayer and three DNA monolayers differing in the position of the mismatch. The monolayers were studied as B-DNA (normal duplex DNA) and after conversion to M-DNA (a metalated duplex). Modeling of the impedance data to an equivalent circuit provides parameters that are useful in discriminating the four monolayer configurations. The resistance to charge transfer, R(CT), was lower for all duplexes after conversion to M-DNA. Contrary to expectations, R(CT) was also found to decrease for duplexes containing a mismatch. However, R(CT) was found to be diagnostic for mismatch detection. In particular, the difference in R(CT) between B- and M-DNA (deltaR(CT)) decreased from 190(22) omega.cm(2) for a perfectly matched duplex to 95(20), 30(20), and 85(20) omega.cm(2) for a mismatch at the top (distal), middle, and bottom (proximal) positions of the monolayer with respect to the gold surface. Further, a method to form loosely packed single-stranded (ss)-DNA monolayers by duplex dehybridization that is able to rehybridize to target strands is presented. Rehybridization efficiencies were in the range of 40-70%. Under incomplete hybridization conditions, the R(CT) was the same for matched and mismatched duplexes under B-DNA conditions. However, deltaR(CT) between B- and M-DNA, under incomplete hybridization, still provided a distinction. The deltaR(CT) for a perfect duplex was 76(12) omega.cm(2), whereas a mismatch in the middle of the sequence yielded a deltaR(CT) value of 30(15) omega.cm(2). The detection limit was measured and the impedance methodology reliably detected single DNA base pair mismatches at concentrations as low as 100 pM.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15253643     DOI: 10.1021/ac049482d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  4 in total

Review 1.  Electrochemical sensors.

Authors:  Eric Bakker; Yu Qin
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Label-Free Impedance Biosensors: Opportunities and Challenges.

Authors:  Jonathan S Daniels; Nader Pourmand
Journal:  Electroanalysis       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 3.223

3.  DNA hybridization sensors based on electrochemical impedance spectroscopy as a detection tool.

Authors:  Jin-Young Park; Su-Moon Park
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Ultrasensitive cDNA detection of dengue virus RNA using electrochemical nanoporous membrane-based biosensor.

Authors:  Varun Rai; Hapuarachchige C Hapuarachchi; Lee Ching Ng; Siew Hwa Soh; Yee Sin Leo; Chee-Seng Toh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.