Literature DB >> 15252878

Processing of auditory information in insects.

R M Hennig1, A Franz, A Stumpner.   

Abstract

Insects exhibit an astonishing diversity in the design of their ears and the subsequent processing of information within their auditory pathways. The aim of this review is to summarize and compare the present concepts of auditory processing by relating behavioral performance to known neuronal mechanisms. We focus on three general aspects, that is frequency, directional, and temporal processing. The first part compares the capacity (in some insects high) for frequency analysis in the ear with the rather low specificity of tuning in interneurons by looking at Q10dB values and frequency dependent inhibition of interneurons. Since sharpening of frequency does not seem to be the prime task of a set of differently tuned receptors, alternative hypotheses are discussed. Moreover, the physiological correspondence between tonotopic projections of receptors and dendritic organization of interneurons is not in all cases strong. The second part is concerned with directional hearing and thus with the ability for angular resolution of insects. The present concepts, as derived from behavioral performances, for angular resolution versus lateralization and serial versus parallel processing of directional and pattern information can be traced to the thoracic level of neuronal processing. Contralateral inhibition, a mechanism for enhancing directional tuning, appears to be most effective in parallel pathways, whereas in serial processing it may have detrimental effects on pattern processing. The third part, after some considerations of signal analysis in the temporal domain, demonstrates that closely related species often use different combinations of temporal parameters in their recognition systems. On the thoracic level, analysis of temporal modulation functions and effects of inhibition on spiking patterns reveals relatively simple processing, whereas brain neurons may exhibit more complex properties. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15252878     DOI: 10.1002/jemt.20052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microsc Res Tech        ISSN: 1059-910X            Impact factor:   2.769


  33 in total

Review 1.  Variability of spike trains and the processing of temporal patterns of acoustic signals-problems, constraints, and solutions.

Authors:  B Ronacher; A Franz; S Wohlgemuth; R M Hennig
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-02-11       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Temporal resolution for calling song signals by female crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus.

Authors:  E Schneider; R M Hennig
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Humming in tune: sex and species recognition by mosquitoes on the wing.

Authors:  Gabriella Gibson; Ben Warren; Ian J Russell
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-10-26

4.  A neural network-based analysis of acoustic courtship signals and female responses in Chorthippus biguttulus grasshoppers.

Authors:  Jan P Wittmann; Munjong Kolss; Klaus Reinhold
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 1.621

5.  Firing-rate resonances in the peripheral auditory system of the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus.

Authors:  Florian Rau; Jan Clemens; Victor Naumov; R Matthias Hennig; Susanne Schreiber
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Response recovery in the locust auditory pathway.

Authors:  Sarah Wirtssohn; Bernhard Ronacher
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Pulse-rate recognition in an insect: evidence of a role for oscillatory neurons.

Authors:  Sarah L Bush; Johannes Schul
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-09-02       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Resonant neurons and bushcricket behaviour.

Authors:  Barbara Webb; Jan Wessnitzer; Sarah Bush; Johannes Schul; Jonas Buchli; Auke Ijspeert
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  The role of frequency, phase and time for processing of amplitude modulated signals by grasshoppers.

Authors:  A Schmidt; B Ronacher; R M Hennig
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Influence of sound pressure level on the processing of amplitude modulations by auditory neurons of the locust.

Authors:  Gerroth Weschke; Bernhard Ronacher
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.