Literature DB >> 15252877

The physiology of insect auditory afferents.

Andrew C Mason1, Paul A Faure.   

Abstract

This review presents an overview of the physiology of primary receptors serving tympanal hearing in insects. Auditory receptor responses vary with frequency, intensity, and temporal characteristics of sound stimuli. Various insect species exploit each of these parameters to differing degrees in the neural coding of auditory information, depending on the nature of the relevant stimuli. Frequency analysis depends on selective tuning in individual auditory receptors. In those insect groups that have individually tuned receptors, differences in physiology are correlated with structural differences among receptors and with the anatomical arrangement of receptors within the ear. Intensity coding is through the rate-level characteristics of tonically active auditory receptors and through variation in the absolute sensitivities of individual receptors (range fractionation). Temporal features of acoustic stimuli may be copied directly in the timing of afferent responses. Salient signal characteristics may also be represented by variation in the timing of afferent responses on a finer temporal scale, or by the synchrony of responses across a population of receptors. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15252877     DOI: 10.1002/jemt.20050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microsc Res Tech        ISSN: 1059-910X            Impact factor:   2.769


  9 in total

1.  Stimulus-dependent auditory tuning results in synchronous population coding of vocalizations in the songbird midbrain.

Authors:  Sarah M N Woolley; Patrick R Gill; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Neural networks a century after Cajal.

Authors:  Walter J Jermakowicz; Vivien A Casagrande
Journal:  Brain Res Rev       Date:  2007-07-13

Review 3.  Selective forces on origin, adaptation and reduction of tympanal ears in insects.

Authors:  Johannes Strauß; Andreas Stumpner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-11-09       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Temporal processing properties of auditory DUM neurons in a bush-cricket.

Authors:  Andreas Stumpner; Paule Chloé Lefebvre; Marvin Seifert; Tim Daniel Ostrowski
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-07-20       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Neural representations of courtship song in the Drosophila brain.

Authors:  Sina Tootoonian; Philip Coen; Risa Kawai; Mala Murthy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Somatic motility and hair bundle mechanics, are both necessary for cochlear amplification?

Authors:  Anthony W Peng; Anthony J Ricci
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  What does a butterfly hear? Physiological characterization of auditory afferents in Morpho peleides (Nymphalidae).

Authors:  Andrew Mikhail; John E Lewis; Jayne E Yack
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Hyperacute directional hearing and phonotactic steering in the cricket (Gryllus bimaculatus deGeer).

Authors:  Stefan Schöneich; Berthold Hedwig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Temperature effects on the tympanal membrane and auditory receptor neurons in the locust.

Authors:  Monika J B Eberhard; Shira D Gordon; James F C Windmill; Bernhard Ronacher
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 1.836

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.