Literature DB >> 15252703

Shoulder and elbow joint power differ as a general feature of vertical arm movements.

J C Galloway1, A Bhat, J C Heathcock, K Manal.   

Abstract

Consistent patterns of joint power underlie coordinated lower extremity behaviors such as running and walking. Recent work found that shoulder and elbow power consistently differed during reaching movements in the horizontal plane. Moreover, joint power during horizontal reaching appears correlated with motor cortical activity. It is not known if the feature of differential joint power extends to vertical plane reaches or to reaches of different movement conditions. The purpose of this study was to test for differential shoulder and elbow power during the acceleratory and deceleratory phases of fast and normal speed vertical reaches in sitting and supine positions. Our results suggest that shoulder and elbow power typically differed both within and across conditions. First, shoulder power values were positive or negative dependent largely on movement direction and movement phase. That is, for each direction and phase, the shoulder either generated or absorbed energy independent of speed or body position. Second, and unexpectedly, reaches of certain condition combinations had similar shoulder power magnitudes across directions. In contrast, elbow power values for each direction varied between positive and negative values depending on phase, speed and position, and no two condition combinations overlapped across directions. Third, as target direction, movement phase and body position varied, shoulder power at fast and normal speeds were linearly correlated, as was shoulder power in sitting and in supine. In contrast, elbow power was linearly correlated only between speeds. These results join other studies to suggest that the neuromotor control of the shoulder may be less complex as compared to the elbow as a general feature of reaching movements. This differential control has important implications for the study of reaching impairments in neurorehabilitation populations, and provides a potentially important variable in the study of cortical firing patterns.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15252703     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-1955-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  35 in total

Review 1.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.

Authors:  M Kawato
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Dissociation between hand motion and population vectors from neural activity in motor cortex.

Authors:  S H Scott; P L Gribble; K M Graham; D W Cabel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-09-13       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Transfer of motor learning across arm configurations.

Authors:  Nicole Malfait; Douglas M Shiller; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The push force pattern in manual wheelchair propulsion as a balance between cost and effect.

Authors:  L A Rozendaal; H E J Veeger; L H V van der Woude
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Mechanical energy and power flow of the upper extremity in manual wheelchair propulsion.

Authors:  Lan-Yuen Guo; Fong-Chin Su; Hong-Wen Wu; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.063

6.  General coordination of shoulder, elbow and wrist dynamics during multijoint arm movements.

Authors:  James C Galloway; Gail F Koshland
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Cortical control of reaching movements.

Authors:  J F Kalaska; S H Scott; P Cisek; L E Sergio
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  Kinematic coordination in human gait: relation to mechanical energy cost.

Authors:  L Bianchi; D Angelini; G P Orani; F Lacquaniti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Age-related differences in lower extremity power after support surface perturbations.

Authors:  Courtney D Hall; Jody L Jensen
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.562

10.  An internal model for sensorimotor integration.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; Z Ghahramani; M I Jordan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The internal model and the leading joint hypothesis: implications for control of multi-joint movements.

Authors:  Natalia Dounskaia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Novel muscle patterns for reaching after cervical spinal cord injury: a case for motor redundancy.

Authors:  Gail F Koshland; James C Galloway; Becky Farley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Control of human limb movements: the leading joint hypothesis and its practical applications.

Authors:  Natalia Dounskaia
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.230

4.  The leading joint hypothesis for spatial reaching arm motions.

Authors:  Satyajit Ambike; James P Schmiedeler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Strategy of arm movement control is determined by minimization of neural effort for joint coordination.

Authors:  Natalia Dounskaia; Yury Shimansky
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Decrease in cortical activation during learning of a multi-joint discrete motor task.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Ikegami; Gentaro Taga
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 1.972

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.