Literature DB >> 15252317

Error in surgical pathology.

David B Troxel1.   

Abstract

A total of 272 surgical pathology claims reported to The Doctors Company from 1998 through 2003 were reviewed. They were analyzed and repetitive patterns involving both specimen type and category of diagnostic error were identified. These patterns were then compared with those uncovered in a prior review of 218 surgical pathology claims reported from 1995 through 1997 to identify trends and see if new patterns of diagnostic error had emerged.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15252317     DOI: 10.1097/01.pas.0000126772.42945.5c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  3 in total

Review 1.  The efficient operation of the surgical pathology gross room.

Authors:  W C Bell; E S Young; P E Billings; W E Grizzle
Journal:  Biotech Histochem       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.718

2.  Tissue contamination causing incorrect diagnosis of breast carcinoma metastatic to skin: An underrecognized complication.

Authors:  Cristian Navarrete-Dechent; Kishwer S Nehal; Klaus J Busam
Journal:  Australas J Dermatol       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 2.875

3.  Introduction of virtual microscopy in routine surgical pathology--a hypothesis and personal view from Europe.

Authors:  Klaus Kayser
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 2.644

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.