Jin Soon Chang1, Samuel S Becker, Stephen S Park. 1. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cutaneous malignancies of the nose are common problems and create the need for nasal reconstruction within many otolaryngology practices. In spite of the fact that such reconstruction is an ancient art, there continue to be innovations and advances that allow for more predictable and functional long-term results. RECENT FINDINGS: Analyzing the nasal defect through an organized algorithm can be useful in many circumstances, especially when one needs to consider vectors of tension, minimizing alar base asymmetry, resultant scars, and preservation of the intranasal airway. Application of the principle of aesthetic subunits has greatly improved the cosmetic results for many large nasal defects, and there have been some proposals to modify the original definitions and concept. Structural reconstruction is paramount with complex defects that involve the nasal framework or with those that are located in functionally critical areas. Autogenous cartilage grafting remains the gold standard, but the use of alloplastic and homograft materials for grafting continues to be reported as an alternative. Internal lining repair is essential with larger defects and the versatility of intranasal flaps is understood, but at times not available. Other flaps have been described and may be useful on such occasions. SUMMARY: There are many considerations during nasal reconstruction, and the surgeon must be facile with a variety of options within his/her armamentarium.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cutaneous malignancies of the nose are common problems and create the need for nasal reconstruction within many otolaryngology practices. In spite of the fact that such reconstruction is an ancient art, there continue to be innovations and advances that allow for more predictable and functional long-term results. RECENT FINDINGS: Analyzing the nasal defect through an organized algorithm can be useful in many circumstances, especially when one needs to consider vectors of tension, minimizing alar base asymmetry, resultant scars, and preservation of the intranasal airway. Application of the principle of aesthetic subunits has greatly improved the cosmetic results for many large nasal defects, and there have been some proposals to modify the original definitions and concept. Structural reconstruction is paramount with complex defects that involve the nasal framework or with those that are located in functionally critical areas. Autogenous cartilage grafting remains the gold standard, but the use of alloplastic and homograft materials for grafting continues to be reported as an alternative. Internal lining repair is essential with larger defects and the versatility of intranasal flaps is understood, but at times not available. Other flaps have been described and may be useful on such occasions. SUMMARY: There are many considerations during nasal reconstruction, and the surgeon must be facile with a variety of options within his/her armamentarium.
Authors: Eva Goldberg-Bockhorn; Silke Schwarz; Rachana Subedi; Alexander Elsässer; Ricarda Riepl; Paul Walther; Ludwig Körber; Roman Breiter; Karl Stock; Nicole Rotter Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2017-12-06 Impact factor: 3.161