Literature DB >> 15251976

A serum proteomics approach to the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy.

G L Gerton1, X J Fan, J Chittams, M Sammel, A Hummel, J F Strauss, K Barnhart.   

Abstract

An ectopic pregnancy (EP) occurs when implantation of the embryo occurs outside of the uterus. If left untreated, the developing fetus will continue to grow, leading to life-threatening consequences for the mother. A major difficulty with the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy is that methods of detection are limited, and some, such as ultrasound, are not very reliable in the earliest days of gestation. Currently, no effective serum test exists to distinguish an ectopic pregnancy from a normal intrauterine pregnancy. The incidence of ectopic pregnancy is increasing and has doubled in the last 20 years. It is now the second most common cause of maternal death in the first trimester of pregnancy. To address this issue, we initiated a project to identify serum markers of ectopic pregnancy. The subjects for these studies presented at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania. We obtained over 140 serum samples from women with suspected ectopic pregnancy: women presenting with pain and/or bleeding in the first trimester of pregnancy. The approximate racial breakdown of the subjects is as follows: African American, 36%; Caucasian, 3%; Asian, 2%; Hispanic, 1%; unknown, 58%. Serum samples from 139 women (62 with ectopic pregnancy and 77 with a normal intrauterine pregnancy) were applied to WCX2 (weak ion exchange) protein chip surfaces and analyzed for serum markers using surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF-MS). Several proteins in the 7500-18,000 Da mass range were identified that may discriminate an ectopic pregnancy from an intrauterine pregnancy. The most promising markers were analyzed using classification and regression tree analysis (CART) with and without clinical variables (serum hCG value, length of amenorrhea). Two different algorithms were developed that classify the patients on the basis of sensitivity (number of EPs who screen positive/# of EPs) or specificity (# of healthy patients who screen negative/# of healthy). Our current approach is to refine these two "rule sets" to segregate patients into three groups: those who need immediate intervention for a probable ectopic pregnancy, those who appear to have a normal pregnancy, and those who need further monitoring for diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15251976     DOI: 10.1196/annals.1318.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  10 in total

1.  A disintegrin and metalloprotease protein-12 as a novel marker for the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Mary E Rausch; Lynn Beer; Mary D Sammel; Peter Takacs; Karine Chung; Alka Shaunik; David Speicher; Kurt T Barnhart
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Metabolomics in premature labor: a novel approach to identify patients at risk for preterm delivery.

Authors:  Roberto Romero; Shali Mazaki-Tovi; Edi Vaisbuch; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Ricardo Gomez; Jyh Kae Nien; Bo Hyun Yoon; Moshe Mazor; Jingqin Luo; David Banks; John Ryals; Chris Beecher
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2010-05-26

3.  Metabolomic identification of novel diagnostic biomarkers in ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Onur Turkoglu; Ayse Citil; Ceren Katar; Ismail Mert; Praveen Kumar; Ali Yilmaz; Dilek S Uygur; Salim Erkaya; Stewart F Graham; Ray O Bahado-Singh
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 4.290

4.  Systematic discovery of ectopic pregnancy serum biomarkers using 3-D protein profiling coupled with label-free quantitation.

Authors:  Lynn A Beer; Hsin-Yao Tang; Sira Sriswasdi; Kurt T Barnhart; David W Speicher
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 5.  Serum biomarkers for detecting ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Mary E Rausch; Kurt T Barnhart
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.190

6.  A proteomic analysis of IVF follicular fluid in women <or=32 years old.

Authors:  Stephanie J Estes; Bin Ye; Weiliang Qiu; Daniel Cramer; Mark D Hornstein; Stacey A Missmer
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 7.  Utility of proteomics in obstetric disorders: a review.

Authors:  Jónathan Hernández-Núñez; Magel Valdés-Yong
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2015-04-13

8.  Expressed proteins and activated pathways in conditioned embryo culture media from IVF patients are diverse according to infertility factors.

Authors:  Tatiana Cs Bonetti; Debora Cm Haddad; Thais S Domingues; Jose Roberto Alegretti; Eduardo LA Motta; Kent Seeley; Ismael Dcg Silva
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2019-10-14

Review 9.  Serum markers in the diagnosis of tubal pregnancy.

Authors:  Fabio Roberto Cabar; Paula Beatriz Fettback; Pedro Paulo Pereira; Marcelo Zugaib
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.365

10.  Comparison of the diagnostic values of circulating steroid hormones, VEGF-A, PIGF, and ADAM12 in women with ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Shien Zou; Xin Li; Yi Feng; Shan Sun; Jin Li; Emil Egecioglu; Håkan Billig; Ruijin Shao
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 5.531

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.