Literature DB >> 15251872

Limbic corticostriatal systems and delayed reinforcement.

Rudolf N Cardinal1, Catharine A Winstanley, Trevor W Robbins, Barry J Everitt.   

Abstract

Impulsive choice, one aspect of impulsivity, is characterized by an abnormally high preference for small, immediate rewards over larger delayed rewards, and can be a feature of adolescence, but also attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), addiction, and other neuropsychiatric disorders. Both the serotonin and dopamine neuromodulator systems are implicated in impulsivity; manipulations of these systems affect animal models of impulsive choice, though these effects may depend on the receptor subtype and whether or not the reward is signaled. These systems project to limbic cortical and striatal structures shown to be abnormal in animal models of ADHD. Damage to the nucleus accumbens core (AcbC) causes rats to exhibit impulsive choice. These rats are also hyperactive, but are unimpaired in tests of visuospatial attention; they may therefore represent an animal model of the hyperactive-impulsive subtype of ADHD. Lesions to the anterior cingulate or medial prefrontal cortex, two afferents to the AcbC, do not induce impulsive choice, but lesions of the basolateral amygdala do, while lesions to the orbitofrontal cortex have had opposite effects in different tasks measuring impulsive choice. In theory, impulsive choice may emerge as a result of abnormal processing of the magnitude of rewards, or as a result of a deficit in the effects of delayed reinforcement. Recent evidence suggests that AcbC-lesioned rats perceive reward magnitude normally, but exhibit a selective deficit in learning instrumental responses using delayed reinforcement, suggesting that the AcbC is a reinforcement learning system that mediates the effects of delayed rewards.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15251872     DOI: 10.1196/annals.1308.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  94 in total

1.  Individuals family history positive for alcoholism show functional magnetic resonance imaging differences in reward sensitivity that are related to impulsivity factors.

Authors:  Melissa M Andrews; Shashwath A Meda; Andre D Thomas; Marc N Potenza; John H Krystal; Patrick Worhunsky; Michael C Stevens; Stephanie O'Malley; Gregory A Book; Brady Reynolds; Godfrey D Pearlson
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 2.  Addiction as a systems failure: focus on adolescence and smoking.

Authors:  Ruben D Baler; Nora D Volkow
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 8.829

3.  Encoding of time-discounted rewards in orbitofrontal cortex is independent of value representation.

Authors:  Matthew R Roesch; Adam R Taylor; Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Previous cocaine exposure makes rats hypersensitive to both delay and reward magnitude.

Authors:  Matthew R Roesch; Yuji Takahashi; Nishan Gugsa; Gregory B Bissonette; Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Behavioral functions of the mesolimbic dopaminergic system: an affective neuroethological perspective.

Authors:  Antonio Alcaro; Robert Huber; Jaak Panksepp
Journal:  Brain Res Rev       Date:  2007-08-21

Review 6.  Should I stay or should I go? Transformation of time-discounted rewards in orbitofrontal cortex and associated brain circuits.

Authors:  Matthew R Roesch; Donna J Calu; Kathryn A Burke; Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  A model of reward choice based on the theory of reinforcement learning.

Authors:  I A Smirnitskaya; A A Frolov; G Kh Merzhanova
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-03

Review 8.  The neurobiology and genetics of impulse control disorders: relationships to drug addictions.

Authors:  Judson A Brewer; Marc N Potenza
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 5.858

9.  Dissociable neural representations of future reward magnitude and delay during temporal discounting.

Authors:  Kacey Ballard; Brian Knutson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Interactions between the prefrontal cortex and amygdala during delay discounting and reversal.

Authors:  John C Churchwell; Andrea M Morris; Nila M Heurtelou; Raymond P Kesner
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.