Literature DB >> 15251351

Accurate method for clinical assessment of right lobe liver weight in adult living-related liver transplant.

G E Gondolesi1, T Yoshizumi, C Bodian, L Kim-Schluger, T Schiano, T Fishbein, M Schwartz, C Miller, S Emre.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Prior to transplantation of segmental liver grafts to adult recipients, it is crucial to confirm that the graft size is safe for the donor, yet adequate for the recipient's metabolic needs. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the current best standards. We applied a new formula to estimate right liver lobe weight in living donors and compared our results with CT and MRI.
METHODS: Between August 1998 and December 20, 91 adults received right lobes from living donors. Donor liver volumes were assessed by CT or MRI. Actual weights of right lobe grafts were determined after back table flushing. We estimated whole liver weights using the formula: 772 x body surface area (BSA). Right lobe liver weight was calculated as 57% of the estimated whole liver weight (R-57).
RESULTS: Mean actual right lobe weight (n = 90) was 855.83 +/- 183.4 g. Estimated right lobe weight was 858.08 +/- 90.80 (R-57, P = NS); 1077.35 +/- 263.07 mL for CT (P = .0001), and 1185.07 +/- 350.10 mL for MRI (P = .0001). Mean graft-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) was 1.23%; there was no significant difference with R-57 GRWR but there was a difference from CT and MRI-GRWR (P = .001). The proportion of cases of estimated right lobe weight and GRWR within 20% of the corresponding actual value were 80% and 90%, respectively, for R-57 versus 36% and 43% for the imaging studies (P = .0001).
CONCLUSION: With readily available software to calculate BSA, physicians can predict right lobe weight knowing only the donor's height and weight. CT and MRI will only be necessary for anatomic liver mapping. Copyright 2004 Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15251351     DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.04.094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  4 in total

1.  Usage of 64-detector-row spiral computed tomography volumetry in preoperative volume prediction in living donor liver transplantation in children.

Authors:  Ying-Cun Li; Yan Hu; Ming-Man Zhang; Xian-Qing Jin; Xiao Fan; Cong-Lun Pu; Chun-Bao Guo; Quan Kang; Xiao-Ke Dai; Yu-Hua Deng
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Three-Dimensional Volumetric Assessment of Graft Volume in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Does It Minimise Errors of Estimation?

Authors:  Nihar Mohapatra; Kishore Gurumoorthy Subramanya Bharathy; Piyush Kumar Sinha; Shridhar Vasantrao Sasturkar; Yashwant Patidar; Viniyendra Pamecha
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2019-03-26

3.  PREOPERATIVE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY VOLUMETRY AND GRAFT WEIGHT ESTIMATION IN ADULT LIVING DONOR LIVER TRANSPLANTATION.

Authors:  Rafael S Pinheiro; Ruy J Cruz; Wellington Andraus; Liliana Ducatti; Rodrigo B Martino; Lucas S Nacif; Vinicius Rocha-Santos; Rubens M Arantes; Quirino Lai; Felicia S Ibuki; Manoel S Rocha; Luiz A C D Albuquerque
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

4.  Accuracy of preoperative CT liver volumetry in living donor hepatectomy and its clinical implications.

Authors:  Sanjay Goja; Sanjay Kumar Yadav; Amardeep Yadav; Tarun Piplani; Amit Rastogi; Prashant Bhangui; Sanjiv Saigal; Arvinder Singh Soin
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 7.293

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.