Literature DB >> 15251162

Quality assurance of the EORTC 26981/22981; NCIC CE3 intergroup trial on radiotherapy with or without temozolomide for newly-diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: the individual case review.

Fatma Ataman1, Philip Poortmans, Roger Stupp, Barbara Fisher, René-Olivier Mirimanoff.   

Abstract

The phase III randomised European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trail Group (NCIC) Intergroup trial (EORTC 26981/22981; CE3) compares irradiation alone with irradiation plus temozolomide for patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). We evaluated the compliance to radiotherapy (RT) guidelines. All 85 recruiting centres were invited to participate in the individual case review. Fifty-four centres (64%) entering 71% of the patients provided data on one randomly selected patient. All participating centres used individual head immobilisation and computerised tomography (CT)-based treatment planning. Most (74%) performed three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3-D-CRT) including dose-volume histograms. Ninety-four percent performed portal imaging at least once. Planning target volume (PTV) and structures at risk were delineated in most of the centres (94%). Although the PTV received < 95% of the prescription dose (60 Gy in 2 Gy/fraction/day) in 39% of the centres; all except 2 centres delivered 50-60 Gy to the PTV. The maximum dose to the critical structures exceeded the protocol dose constraints in 39% of the reviewed patients, but in only 9% was this over the acceptable tolerance dose reported in the literature. We found a high rate of compliance with the protocol and general RT guidelines in the centres participating in this individual case review. In multicentre trials with a large of number of investigators from international and national groups, it is essential to confirm the interinstitutional consistency, qualitatively and quantitatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15251162     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2004.03.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  6 in total

Review 1.  From imaging to biology of glioblastoma: new clinical oncology perspectives to the problem of local recurrence.

Authors:  A Zygogianni; M Protopapa; A Kougioumtzopoulou; F Simopoulou; S Nikoloudi; V Kouloulias
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Use of 11C-methionine PET to monitor the effects of temozolomide chemotherapy in malignant gliomas.

Authors:  Norbert Galldiks; Lutz W Kracht; Lothar Burghaus; Anne Thomas; Andreas H Jacobs; Wolf-Dieter Heiss; Karl Herholz
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Immunotherapeutic approaches for glioma.

Authors:  Hideho Okada; Gary Kohanbash; Xinmei Zhu; Edward R Kastenhuber; Aki Hoji; Ryo Ueda; Mitsugu Fujita
Journal:  Crit Rev Immunol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  Can 3D-CRT meet the desired dose distribution to target and OARs in glioblastoma? A tertiary cancer center experience.

Authors:  Narendra Kumar; Srinivasa Gy; Chinna B Dracham; Treshita Dey; Renu Madan; Divya Khosla; Arun Oinum; Rakesh Kapoor
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2020-09-18

5.  Postoperative radiotherapy for glioma: improved delineation of the clinical target volume using the geodesic distance calculation.

Authors:  DanFang Yan; SenXiang Yan; ZhongJie Lu; Cong Xie; Wei Chen; Xing Xu; Xinke Li; Haogang Yu; Xinli Zhu; LingYan Zheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Radiotherapy of Glioblastoma 15 Years after the Landmark Stupp's Trial: More Controversies than Standards?

Authors:  Tomas Kazda; Adam Dziacky; Petr Burkon; Petr Pospisil; Marek Slavik; Zdenek Rehak; Radim Jancalek; Pavel Slampa; Ondrej Slaby; Radek Lakomy
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 4.214

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.