Julie O'Halloran1, Graeme C Miller, Helena Britt. 1. Family Medicine Research Centre, University of Sydney, Acacia House, PO Box 533, Wentworthville NSW 2145, Australia. julieo@med.usyd.edu.au
Abstract
BACKGROUND: With the increasing prevalence of chronic conditions, there is need for a standardized definition of chronicity for use in research, to evaluate the population prevalence and general practice management of chronic conditions. OBJECTIVES: Our aims were to determine the characteristics required to define chronicity, apply them to a primary care classification and provide a defined codeset of chronic conditions. METHODS: A literature review evaluated characteristics used to define chronic conditions. The final set of characteristics was applied to the International Classification of Primary Care-Version 2 (ICPC-2) through more specific terms available in ICPC-2 PLUS, an extended terminology classified to ICPC-2. A set of ICPC-2 rubrics was delineated as representing chronic conditions. RESULTS: Factors found to be relevant to a definition of chronic conditions for research were: duration; prognosis; pattern; and sequelae. Within ICPC-2, 129 rubrics were described as 'chronic', and another 20 rubrics had elements of chronicity. Duration was the criterion most frequently satisfied (98.4% of chronic rubrics), while 88.2% of rubrics met at least three of the four criteria. CONCLUSION: Monitoring the prevalence and management of chronic conditions is of increasing importance. This study provided evidence for multifaceted definitions of chronicity. While all characteristics examined could be used by those interested in chronicity, the list has been designed to identify chronic conditions managed in Australian general practice, and is therefore not a nomenclature of all chronic conditions. Subsequent analysis of chronic conditions using pre-existing data sets will provide a baseline measure of chronic condition prevalence and management in general practice.
BACKGROUND: With the increasing prevalence of chronic conditions, there is need for a standardized definition of chronicity for use in research, to evaluate the population prevalence and general practice management of chronic conditions. OBJECTIVES: Our aims were to determine the characteristics required to define chronicity, apply them to a primary care classification and provide a defined codeset of chronic conditions. METHODS: A literature review evaluated characteristics used to define chronic conditions. The final set of characteristics was applied to the International Classification of Primary Care-Version 2 (ICPC-2) through more specific terms available in ICPC-2 PLUS, an extended terminology classified to ICPC-2. A set of ICPC-2 rubrics was delineated as representing chronic conditions. RESULTS: Factors found to be relevant to a definition of chronic conditions for research were: duration; prognosis; pattern; and sequelae. Within ICPC-2, 129 rubrics were described as 'chronic', and another 20 rubrics had elements of chronicity. Duration was the criterion most frequently satisfied (98.4% of chronic rubrics), while 88.2% of rubrics met at least three of the four criteria. CONCLUSION: Monitoring the prevalence and management of chronic conditions is of increasing importance. This study provided evidence for multifaceted definitions of chronicity. While all characteristics examined could be used by those interested in chronicity, the list has been designed to identify chronic conditions managed in Australian general practice, and is therefore not a nomenclature of all chronic conditions. Subsequent analysis of chronic conditions using pre-existing data sets will provide a baseline measure of chronic condition prevalence and management in general practice.
Authors: Umesh T Kadam; Francois G Schellevis; Martyn Lewis; Danielle A W M van der Windt; Henrica C W de Vet; Lex M Bouter; Peter R Croft Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2009-01-30 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Alison J Yarnall; Avan A Sayer; Andrew Clegg; Kenneth Rockwood; Stuart Parker; John V Hindle Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Parker Magin; Amanda Tapley; Adrian J Dunlop; Andrew Davey; Mieke van Driel; Elizabeth Holliday; Simon Morgan; Kim Henderson; Jean Ball; Nigel Catzikiris; Katie Mulquiney; Neil Spike; Rohan Kerr; Simon Holliday Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-07-23 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Michael A Steinman; Sei J Lee; W John Boscardin; Yinghui Miao; Kathy Z Fung; Kelly L Moore; Janice B Schwartz Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2012-10-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Tom Brett; Diane Elizabeth Arnold-Reed; Aurora Popescu; Bishoy Soliman; Max Kishor Bulsara; Hilary Fine; Geoff Bovell; Robert George Moorhead Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2013 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.166