Literature DB >> 15249459

Septic shock of early or late onset: does it matter?

Oscar Roman-Marchant1, Carlos E A Orellana-Jimenez, Daniel De Backer, Christian Melot, Jean-Louis Vincent.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: To determine possible differences in morbidity and mortality between early and late onset of septic shock in ICU patients.
DESIGN: Systematic data collection.
SETTING: Thirty-one-bed, mixed, medicosurgical ICU in a university hospital. PATIENTS: All 65 patients who acquired septic shock after admission to the ICU between February 1999 and April 2000.
INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: Forty-one of the 65 patients presented with septic shock within 24 h of admission to the ICU (early septic shock [ESS]); the other 21 patients acquired septic shock > 24 h after ICU admission (late septic shock [LSS]). Eleven patients had a second episode (7 patients in the ESS group, and 4 patients in the LSS group), and 1 patient in the LSS group had a third episode of septic shock. Patients with ESS had higher APACHE (acute physiology and chronic health evaluation) II (mean +/- SD, 26 +/- 6 vs 20 +/- 6; p = 0.002) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores (11 +/- 3 vs 7 +/- 3, p < 0.001) on ICU admission, and a higher blood lactate concentration at the onset of shock (median 3.70 mEq/L; interquartile range, 2.6 to 6.6 mEq/L; vs median, 2.50 mEq/L [interquartile range, 1.8 to 4.0 mEq/L], p = 0.03) than patients with LSS. However, the duration of septic shock (median, 42 h [interquartile range, 21 to 97 h] vs median, 93 h [interquartile range, 32 to 241 h], p = 0.058) and the length of ICU stay after the onset of septic shock (median, 75 h; [interquartile range, 38 to 203 h] vs median, 321 h [interquartile range, 96 to 438 h], p = 0.018), was shorter in patients with ESS than patients with LSS. The ICU mortality rate was 63% (26 patients) in the ESS group, and 88% (21 patients) in the LSS group (p = 0.071). At the onset of the first episode of shock, patients with ESS had higher SOFA scores (11 +/- 3 vs 9 +/- 3, p = 0.045), lower pH (7.24 +/- 0.15 vs 7.33 +/- 0.12, p = 0.01), and were treated with higher doses of dopamine (median, 20 microg/kg/min [interquartile range, 14 to 20 microg/kg/min] vs median, 12 microg/kg/min [interquartile range, 8 to 20 microg/kg/min], p = 0.028) than patients with LSS.
CONCLUSIONS: Septic shock is more severe when of early onset, as reflected by more severe organ dysfunction, greater lactic acidosis, and higher vasopressor requirements, yet the outcome is better, as reflected by a shorter duration of the shock episode, shorter ICU stay, and slightly lower mortality rates. These differences may influence clinical trials of therapeutic agents for sepsis, and should be taken into account when analyzing the results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15249459     DOI: 10.1378/chest.126.1.173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  9 in total

1.  Relationships among initial hospital triage, disease progression and mortality in community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  Samuel M Brown; Jason P Jones; Dominik Aronsky; Barbara E Jones; Michael J Lanspa; Nathan C Dean
Journal:  Respirology       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 6.424

2.  Early septic shock induces loss of oxidative phosphorylation yield plasticity in liver mitochondria.

Authors:  Pierre Eyenga; Damien Roussel; Jérôme Morel; Benjamin Rey; Caroline Romestaing; Loic Teulier; Shey-Shing Sheu; Joelle Goudable; Claude Négrier; Jean Paul Viale
Journal:  J Physiol Biochem       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 4.158

3.  Risk factors and impact of major bleeding in critically ill patients receiving heparin thromboprophylaxis.

Authors:  François Lauzier; Donald M Arnold; Christian Rabbat; Diane Heels-Ansdell; Ryan Zarychanski; Peter Dodek; Betty Jean Ashley; Martin Albert; Kosar Khwaja; Marlies Ostermann; Yoanna Skrobik; Robert Fowler; Lauralyn McIntyre; Joseph L Nates; Tim Karachi; Renato D Lopes; Nicole Zytaruk; Simon Finfer; Mark Crowther; Deborah Cook
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  A Pilot Study of the Performance Characteristics of the D-dimer in Presumed Sepsis.

Authors:  Phillip J Goebel; Justin B Williams; Robert T Gerhardt
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2010-05

5.  Corticosteroids influence the mortality and morbidity of acute critical illness.

Authors:  Mohamed Y Rady; Daniel J Johnson; Bhavesh Patel; Joel Larson; Richard Helmers
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  What happens to the fluid balance during and after recovering from septic shock?

Authors:  Andrea Regina Lopes Cunha; Suzana Margareth Ajeje Lobo
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2015-03-01

7.  Predictors of septic shock following anastomotic leak after major gastrointestinal surgery: An audit from a tertiary care institute.

Authors:  Anirban Hom Choudhuri; Rajeev Uppal
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-09

Review 8.  Bench-to-bedside review: the initial hemodynamic resuscitation of the septic patient according to Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines--does one size fit all?

Authors:  Azriel Perel
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Comparison of community-acquired, hospital-acquired, and intensive care unit-acquired acute respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective observational cohort study.

Authors:  Kuo-Chin Kao; Han-Chung Hu; Meng-Jer Hsieh; Ying-Huang Tsai; Chung-Chi Huang
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 9.097

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.