Literature DB >> 15249295

Uncertain benefit: the public policy of approving smallpox vaccine research.

Rosemary B Quigley1.   

Abstract

Without an accurate assessment of the prospect of bioterrorist attack, it is especially challenging to evaluate the protocols for testing smallpox vaccines in the pediatric population. Usual regulatory mechanisms cannot shepherd research protocols with benefits that can only be characterized as "uncertain" in the face of more than minimal risk. When a protocol is placed in a government forum for analysis, the public has a unique opportunity to debate the balancing of research risks and benefits on behalf of children who are unable to assent to research themselves, as well as to express views about vaccination policy broadly. This model for review of pediatric research that may be without benefit will be especially important as challenging studies of various vaccines against a range of infectious properties, such as anthrax and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), emerge.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15249295      PMCID: PMC1448369          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.94.6.943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  11 in total

1.  Clinical responses to undiluted and diluted smallpox vaccine.

Authors:  Sharon E Frey; Robert B Couch; Carol O Tacket; John J Treanor; Mark Wolff; Frances K Newman; Robert L Atmar; Robert Edelman; Carrie M Nolan; Robert B Belshe
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-03-28       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Contact vaccinia--transmission of vaccinia from smallpox vaccination.

Authors:  John M Neff; J Michael Lane; Vincent A Fulginiti; Donald A Henderson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-10-16       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Testing medications in children.

Authors:  Robert Steinbrook
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-10-31       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  The US smallpox vaccination plan.

Authors:  Jon S Abramson; Julia A McMillan; Robert S Baltimore
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.

Authors:  W K Mariner
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Children as research subjects: a proposal to revise the current federal regulations using a moral framework.

Authors:  L F Ross
Journal:  Stanford Law Pol Rev       Date:  1997

7.  Risks of smallpox vaccination complications in the United States.

Authors:  J M Lane; J D Millar
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  The case for abolishing routine childhood smallpox vaccination in the United States.

Authors:  J M Neff
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 9.  Smallpox as a biological weapon: medical and public health management. Working Group on Civilian Biodefense.

Authors:  D A Henderson; T V Inglesby; J G Bartlett; M S Ascher; E Eitzen; P B Jahrling; J Hauer; M Layton; J McDade; M T Osterholm; T O'Toole; G Parker; T Perl; P K Russell; K Tonat
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-06-09       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Smallpox vaccine.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The social, political, ethical, and economic aspects of biodefense vaccines.

Authors:  Gregory A Poland; Robert M Jacobson; Jon Tilburt; Kristin Nichol
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Neurologic adverse events associated with smallpox vaccination in the United States--response and comment on reporting of headaches as adverse events after smallpox vaccination among military and civilian personnel.

Authors:  Walter R Schumm
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 8.775

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.