Literature DB >> 15249288

Getting the science right and doing the right science in vaccine safety.

Roger Bernier1, Karen Midthun.   

Abstract

Because of the potential for conflicts of interest, Salmon et al. propose in this issue the creation of an independent vaccine safety board to assume responsibility for assessing the safety of licensed vaccines.We believe that the current system at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) facilitates needed interactions between those involved in risk assessment and risk management, provides substantial safeguards against conflicts of interest, and results in sound decisions. The CDC, given its role in promoting immunization, may be perceived to have a greater potential conflict and plans to review its vaccine safety activities. Both agencies recognize the importance of transparency in considering vaccine safety and welcome the opportunity to work with the public and the medical community to improve the quality of scientific information and decisionmaking.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15249288      PMCID: PMC1448362          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.94.6.914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  1 in total

1.  Enhancing public confidence in vaccines through independent oversight of postlicensure vaccine safety.

Authors:  Daniel A Salmon; Lawrence H Moulton; Neal A Halsey
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 9.308

  1 in total
  1 in total

1.  Transferring knowledge about human subjects protections and the role of institutional review boards in a community-based participatory research project.

Authors:  Raymond R Hyatt; David M Gute; Alex Pirie; Helen Page; Ismael Vasquez; Franklin Dalembert
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 9.308

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.